Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 18:42 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 18:42
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
 1   2   
User avatar
djanand
User avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Last visit: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
386
 [28]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 386
 [28]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 01 May 2014, 05:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (01:35) correct 56% (01:48) wrong based on 1137 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,387
 [10]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,387
 [10]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 22 Sep 2014, 22:24
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.
Show more

Responding to a pm:

Alarms should start ringing whenever you see percentages in a GMAT critical reasoning question, as percentages require context that CR stimuli almost never supply. In this case, 90% sounds great, but if that 90% means 90% of 10 incompetent dentists or 90% of 100 bribed dentists it isn’t a very impressive figure, is it? If we don’t know what sample that 90% comes from, we can’t say if it’s a resounding endorsement of Galactico gum, so (A) is the best answer here.

(B) is not correct. The problem with the argument is not "Great taste and great dental health need not go together."
The argument does not say that great taste and great dental health should go together. It only says that in this product, they do go together. The commercial gives you premises that give support to dental health and then tells you that the gum has taste and health benefits so if you want those, go for the gum. It doesn't imply that great taste comes automatically with great health. Just that in this product, both are present.
General Discussion
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 502
Own Kudos:
672
 [3]
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 502
Kudos: 672
 [3]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 01 May 2014, 06:06
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A seems the best answer :The method used to survey the dentists is not given
to make the reasoning dubious we can argue that the dentist who were surveyed were not really free of bias !!
User avatar
djanand
User avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Last visit: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
386
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 386
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 01 May 2014, 06:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I haven't seen such a question stem earlier. Hence, got stumped. The Stem says 'Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?' . Does this mean that we have to make the argument seem dubious ? Any thoughts ?
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 502
Own Kudos:
672
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 502
Kudos: 672
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 01 May 2014, 06:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
djanand
I haven't seen such a question stem earlier. Hence, got stumped. The Stem says 'Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?' . Does this mean that we have to make the argument seem dubious ? Any thoughts ?
Show more

to make the argument dubious means u have to create the flaws in argument ----->or u have to find faults with the argument !!
User avatar
djanand
User avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Last visit: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
386
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 386
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 01 May 2014, 09:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks. But, my doubt remains as is. The question stem creates ambiguity by introducing the word example.
User avatar
maggie27
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Last visit: 19 May 2015
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
368
Given Kudos: 1,474
Posts: 75
Kudos: 368
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 20 Jul 2014, 18:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A seems out of scope to me. B seems to be the only plausible choice(However, B too is not making much sense to me).
Experts please comment.
User avatar
ronr34
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
253
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 240
Kudos: 253
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 19 Sep 2014, 07:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maggie27
A seems out of scope to me. B seems to be the only plausible choice(However, B too is not making much sense to me).
Experts please comment.
Show more
Agree.
I also chose B, and can't really see why A would be the correct answer.
Can anyone help?
User avatar
pradeepss
User avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Last visit: 21 Dec 2014
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
213
Given Kudos: 257
Status:Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Location: United States (CA)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 213
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 20 Sep 2014, 12:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: A.
Reason:
Statement say dentists prefer GG over other gums but for what? Maybe for taste and not so much for good dental health. so this makes is dubious based on claims made by the commercial.
User avatar
ronr34
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
253
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 240
Kudos: 253
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 21 Sep 2014, 01:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pradeepss
Answer: A.
Reason:
Statement say dentists prefer GG over other gums but for what? Maybe for taste and not so much for good dental health. so this makes is dubious based on claims made by the commercial.
Show more
Can't the same logic be used to select B as the correct answer?
What is the difference between the two?
User avatar
aadikamagic
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Last visit: 04 Dec 2017
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
872
Given Kudos: 14
Schools: ISB '17 (A) IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Schools: ISB '17 (A) IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Posts: 72
Kudos: 872
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 22 Sep 2014, 06:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My Answer was B as well. I really don't understand the difference between A and B.
User avatar
Ashishmathew01081987
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2020
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
313
Given Kudos: 71
Status:I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Energy)
Posts: 92
Kudos: 313
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 22 Sep 2014, 23:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.
Show more


The Break-Up Method :
Conclusion : if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.
Words to focus on : 1) great taste and great dental health 2) the experts

Premises :
1) 90% of the dentists surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum.
2) Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis
3) evaluated and approved by the federal health authority

Elimination of Answer Choices :

Statement E - Conclusion is to prevent bad breath and dental problems and not about likes and dislikes. SO CROSSED.

Statement D - The use of word "MIGHT RECOMMEND" calls for an added assumption that dentists/experts prescribe other gums but none of the premises support this. SO CROSSED

Statement C - The use of word "FEW CONSUMERS" is questionable because most of the consumers might care about dental health. So this statement in no way weakens the conclusion. SO CROSSED.

Statement B - Great taste and great dental health need not go together. No premise given can be used to prove this statement to be true. SO CROSSED .

Statement A - Compares "DENTISTS" with "EXPERTS" and 90 % of dentists may or may not represent the Dentists who are supposed to be Experts. This statement has a direct attack on a premise and hence can do the most damage to the conclusion. SO SELECTED..
avatar
intheend14
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2019
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
146
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Schools: Stanford '18 Haas '18 Wharton '18 Kellogg PT '18 Insead Sept '16
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.94
Schools: Stanford '18 Haas '18 Wharton '18 Kellogg PT '18 Insead Sept '16
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 125
Kudos: 146
 [1]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 02 Oct 2014, 06:51
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I chose A. We don't know if the dentists are a representative sampling or whether there is bias involved.
User avatar
sinhap07
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
30
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 48
Kudos: 30
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 19 Jun 2015, 02:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.
Show more

Responding to a pm:

Alarms should start ringing whenever you see percentages in a GMAT critical reasoning question, as percentages require context that CR stimuli almost never supply. In this case, 90% sounds great, but if that 90% means 90% of 10 incompetent dentists or 90% of 100 bribed dentists it isn’t a very impressive figure, is it? If we don’t know what sample that 90% comes from, we can’t say if it’s a resounding endorsement of Galactico gum, so (A) is the best answer here.

(B) is not correct. The problem with the argument is not "Great taste and great dental health need not go together."
The argument does not say that great taste and great dental health should go together. It only says that in this product, they do go together. The commercial gives you premises that give support to dental health and then tells you that the gum has taste and health benefits so if you want those, go for the gum. It doesn't imply that great taste comes automatically with great health. Just that in this product, both are present.[/quote
Dear Karishma

Have been following veritas material where it says paradox questions should be treated like strengthen questions...wonder how option A is strengthening the conclusion? If at all, Iam afraid it weakens.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,387
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,387
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 21 Jun 2015, 22:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sinhap07
VeritasPrepKarishma
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.

Responding to a pm:

Alarms should start ringing whenever you see percentages in a GMAT critical reasoning question, as percentages require context that CR stimuli almost never supply. In this case, 90% sounds great, but if that 90% means 90% of 10 incompetent dentists or 90% of 100 bribed dentists it isn’t a very impressive figure, is it? If we don’t know what sample that 90% comes from, we can’t say if it’s a resounding endorsement of Galactico gum, so (A) is the best answer here.

(B) is not correct. The problem with the argument is not "Great taste and great dental health need not go together."
The argument does not say that great taste and great dental health should go together. It only says that in this product, they do go together. The commercial gives you premises that give support to dental health and then tells you that the gum has taste and health benefits so if you want those, go for the gum. It doesn't imply that great taste comes automatically with great health. Just that in this product, both are present.
Show more
Dear Karishma

Have been following veritas material where it says paradox questions should be treated like strengthen questions...wonder how option A is strengthening the conclusion? If at all, Iam afraid it weakens.[/quote]

This is not a paradox question. It is a weaken question.
"Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?" - you are looking for the fault in the reasoning. Therefore, answer (A) checks out.
Why did you think that the question has two conflicting situations?
User avatar
pacifist85
User avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2014
Last visit: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
459
 [1]
Given Kudos: 169
Status:Math is psycho-logical
Location: Netherlands
GMAT Date: 02-11-2015
WE:Psychology and Counseling (Other)
Posts: 322
Kudos: 459
 [1]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 08 Aug 2015, 09:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.

Responding to a pm:

Alarms should start ringing whenever you see percentages in a GMAT critical reasoning question, as percentages require context that CR stimuli almost never supply. In this case, 90% sounds great, but if that 90% means 90% of 10 incompetent dentists or 90% of 100 bribed dentists it isn’t a very impressive figure, is it? If we don’t know what sample that 90% comes from, we can’t say if it’s a resounding endorsement of Galactico gum, so (A) is the best answer here.

(B) is not correct. The problem with the argument is not "Great taste and great dental health need not go together."
The argument does not say that great taste and great dental health should go together. It only says that in this product, they do go together. The commercial gives you premises that give support to dental health and then tells you that the gum has taste and health benefits so if you want those, go for the gum. It doesn't imply that great taste comes automatically with great health. Just that in this product, both are present.
Show more

This is correct (sample size could be small), but A does not say that. It questions the method used to survey the participants. This could be for example face to face interviews, phone interviews, online surveys, self reporting, likert scales etc etc etc. The explanation provided in red speaks about sample size. In research, you wouldn't relate the method that was used to survey a participant with the sample size. You could say for example that the results are not valid, because the sample size could be small. And this would be a restriction of the survey.

In any case, this could be a possible answer to each one of these research related questions, unless every one of them speaks about sample size in the stem.

In my opinion none of the answer choices fits. A is the least wrong, but I believe that it is still wrong.
User avatar
kanigmat011
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Last visit: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 194
Own Kudos:
393
Given Kudos: 15
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
Posts: 194
Kudos: 393
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 11 Oct 2015, 10:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can somebody spot error in choice D

Was stuck b/w A and D

Choose D considering the info in the stimulus correct.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,387
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,387
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 12 Oct 2015, 00:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pacifist85
VeritasPrepKarishma
djanand
Commercial: 90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors, and why wouldn’t they? Galactico gum is the only gum proven to help bad breath and gingivitis, statements that have been evaluated and approved by the federal health authority. So if you care about great taste and great dental health, trust the experts and pick up Galactico gum.

Which of the following is an example of dubious reasoning in the argument?

A. The method used to survey the dentists is not given.

B. Great taste and great dental health need not go together.

C. Few consumers care about great dental health

D. The dentists might also recommend a number of other gums.

E. Galactico gum may not be to everyone’s liking.

Please provide explanations.

Responding to a pm:

Alarms should start ringing whenever you see percentages in a GMAT critical reasoning question, as percentages require context that CR stimuli almost never supply. In this case, 90% sounds great, but if that 90% means 90% of 10 incompetent dentists or 90% of 100 bribed dentists it isn’t a very impressive figure, is it? If we don’t know what sample that 90% comes from, we can’t say if it’s a resounding endorsement of Galactico gum, so (A) is the best answer here.

(B) is not correct. The problem with the argument is not "Great taste and great dental health need not go together."
The argument does not say that great taste and great dental health should go together. It only says that in this product, they do go together. The commercial gives you premises that give support to dental health and then tells you that the gum has taste and health benefits so if you want those, go for the gum. It doesn't imply that great taste comes automatically with great health. Just that in this product, both are present.

This is correct (sample size could be small), but A does not say that. It questions the method used to survey the participants. This could be for example face to face interviews, phone interviews, online surveys, self reporting, likert scales etc etc etc. The explanation provided in red speaks about sample size. In research, you wouldn't relate the method that was used to survey a participant with the sample size. You could say for example that the results are not valid, because the sample size could be small. And this would be a restriction of the survey.

In any case, this could be a possible answer to each one of these research related questions, unless every one of them speaks about sample size in the stem.

In my opinion none of the answer choices fits. A is the least wrong, but I believe that it is still wrong.
Show more

It doesn't matter how you define "method of survey" - the generic, all-encompassing answer to "How did you conduct the survey?" which includes everything or the much more specific "what questions did you ask?" - point is, we are raising concern about the validity of the survey and that is a valid point. GMAT doesn't expect you to decide on the definition you are going to apply to the given terms - it will not matter in any case.
A biased questionnaire could have been used for the survey - for example:
In your opinion, how much did Galactico help in reducing bad breath?
1. 25%
2. 50%
3. 75%
4. 100%
In your opinion, how much did ABC gum help in reducing bad breath?
1. 0%
2. 25%
3. 50%
4. 75%

In any case, answer (A) works.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,387
 [1]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,387
 [1]
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer 12 Oct 2015, 00:25
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kanigmat011
Can somebody spot error in choice D

Was stuck b/w A and D

Choose D considering the info in the stimulus correct.
Show more

(D) is not correct. The argument says,
"90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Galactico gum to any of its competitors"

So, dentists might recommend other gums too, but according to the survey, they prefer Galactico over all others. They may recommend Galactico the most. So option (D) does not find a weakness in our argument.
User avatar
LogicGuru1
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 463
Own Kudos:
2,644
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 463
Kudos: 2,644
90% of the dentists we surveyed state that they prefer Updated on: 13 Jun 2016, 11:13
Originally posted by LogicGuru1 on 13 Jun 2016, 00:39.
Last edited by LogicGuru1 on 13 Jun 2016, 11:13, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

THE ANSWER IS A



Explaination :- Relative percentage can easily disguise reality.
In fact this is the most common trick used by advertiser to fool consumers in real life. Pepsi, Toyota, Nike, Levi's, McDonalds all have used this trick one time in the past to fool the customers.

There are 10,000 dentist.
Gum company surveyed only 10 dentist.
90% of 10 is 9 dentist.

The gum company made the claim about their chewing gum based on the positive response of 9 dentist. This is absurd, ludicrous and totally wrong.
9 dentist is not a big enough sample to correctly represent the total population size of the all the dentists.
Also possible is that the kids of all these 10 dentist are manager, shareholders, advertisers, suppliers of the gum. This makes the dentist endorsement suspect.

Reasoning is flawed

HENCE A
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
499 posts
bhanu29
358 posts