Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
64% (01:55) correct
36%
(01:56)
wrong
based on 1205
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Emissions from automobiles that burn gasoline and automobiles that burn diesel fuel are threatening the quality of life on our planet, contaminating both urban air and global atmosphere. Therefore, the only effective way to reduce such emissions is to replace the conventional diesel fuel and gasoline used in automobiles with cleaner-burning fuels, such as methanol, that create fewer emissions.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and gasoline.
(C) If given a choice of automobile fuels, automobile owners would not select gasoline over methanol.
(D) Automobile emissions constitute the most serious threat to the global environment.
(E) At any given time there is a direct correlation between the level of urban air pollution and the level of contamination present in the global atmosphere.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and gasoline.
(C) If given a choice of automobile fuels, automobile owners would not select gasoline over methanol.
(D) Automobile emissions constitute the most serious threat to the global environment.
(E) At any given time there is a direct correlation between the level of urban air pollution and the level of contamination present in the global atmosphere.
24 Apr 2021, 07:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
WinWinMBA
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
The last sentence contains the conclusion of the argument, which is conditional (note the use of the necessary condition indicator “only”): ERE = Effectively reduce emissions, Replace = Replace the conventional diesel fuel and gasoline used in automobiles with cleaner-burning fuels, such as methanol, that create fewer emissions. ERE Replace. According to the author, to effectively reduce emissions, conventional fuels must be replaced. Based on our discussion, since the stimulus does not present any conditional chains, you should look for an answer that protects the necessary condition. Answer choice (A) is a Defender that does just that, eliminating an idea that would undermine the relationship.
Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer. Consider the author’s position that the only effective way to reduce emissions is fuel replacement. Wouldn’t it be more effective to simply stop using cars altogether? Of course this is true, but this would undermine the conditional nature of the conclusion and so the author assumes that this possibility cannot occur. If this answer is troubling you, use the Assumption Negation Technique and ask yourself if the following statement would undermine the argument: Reducing the use of automobiles would be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol. This answer clearly shows that there are other, more effective ways of reducing missions and therefore the answer attacks the argument. This must be the correct answer.
Answer choice (B): The author is not committed to methanol because the stimulus clearly references “fuels such as methanol.” Accordingly, this answer is not an assumption of the argument.
Answer choice (C): The choices automobile owners would make are not part of the argument made by the author. The author simply states that the only effective way to achieve reduced emissions is fuel replacement. No assumption is made about whether automobile owners would follow that way. The problem with the answer can be highlighted by this example: An argument is made that the best way to achieve long-lasting fame is to commit suicide. Does the author assume that people will or will not choose that path? No, because the best way does not involve an assumption about how people will actually act.
Answer choice (D): This answer falls under the second of the three quirks discussed in the previous section. The author clearly believes that automobile emissions are a serious threat to the environment, but this does not mean that the author has assumed they are the most serious threat. Negate the answer and ask yourself, “What would the author say to the negation?” The author would reply that he or she never indicated that emissions were the most serious threat, so it is fine that they are not.
Answer choice (E): We know that both urban air and the global atmosphere are contaminated by cars, but the author does not indicate that there is a direct correlation between the two. This answer, when negated, has no effect on the argument (and must therefore be incorrect). In an Assumption question, there can be only one answer that will hurt the argument when negated. If you negate the answers and think that two or more hurt the argument, you have made a mistake.
General Discussion
15 Jun 2005, 18:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Premise:
1) Emissions from autmobiles that burn gasoline/diesel fuel contaminate urban air and global atmosphere
2) Threathen quality of life
Conclusion:
3) ONLY effective solution is to replace diesel/gasoline with cleaner-burning fuels (methanol) that create fewer emmissions.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol.
- A. shows that only effectiv solution is to replace the type of fuel used.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and gasoline.
- Out. The use of such as in the conclusion suggests there's more than just methanol that can do the trick
(C) If given a choice of automobile fuels, automobile owners would not select gasoline over methanol.
- not important
(D) Automobile emissions constitute the most serious threat to the global environment.
- does not hold up conclusion
(E) At any given time there is a direct correlation between the level of urban air pollution and the level of contamination present in the global atmosphere.
- out of scope
A it is.
1) Emissions from autmobiles that burn gasoline/diesel fuel contaminate urban air and global atmosphere
2) Threathen quality of life
Conclusion:
3) ONLY effective solution is to replace diesel/gasoline with cleaner-burning fuels (methanol) that create fewer emmissions.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not be a more effective means to reduce automobile emissions than the use of methanol.
- A. shows that only effectiv solution is to replace the type of fuel used.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and gasoline.
- Out. The use of such as in the conclusion suggests there's more than just methanol that can do the trick
(C) If given a choice of automobile fuels, automobile owners would not select gasoline over methanol.
- not important
(D) Automobile emissions constitute the most serious threat to the global environment.
- does not hold up conclusion
(E) At any given time there is a direct correlation between the level of urban air pollution and the level of contamination present in the global atmosphere.
- out of scope
A it is.
