The slow advancement of the technology used in golf balls

Question

The slow advancement of the technology used in golf balls is a reflection of the demand which manufacturers aim to meet. Only goflers active in competition tournaments are willing to pay the high price necessary to justify the reserach and development costs needed to generate an innovative golf ball. Therefore, the technology that manufacturers pursue is limited to that which is deemed permissible for competition go tournaments.

The above conclusion rests upon which of the following assumptions ?

A. The slow pace of technological advancement is a consequence of golf ball manufacturers not wanting to manufacture different products for different national markets.

B. Unless the market for balls for competition golfers expands, the market for golf balls for non-competing golfers will not expand

C. Innovative golf balls are more likely to be developed by small, young manufacturing companies than by industry giants.

D. There is not a strong demand for non-competition permissible golf balls generated by competition golfers.

E. The authorities who determine what is permissible in competition gold tournaments are not necessarily up-to-date on cutting edge technological improvemments.

mba1382 · Answer

Premises: The slow advancement of the technology used in golf balls is a reflection of the demand which manufacturers aim to meet. Only golfers active in competition tournaments are willing to pay the high price necessary to justify the research and development costs needed to generate an innovative golf ball. Conclusion: Therefore, the technology that manufacturers pursue is limited to that which is deemed permissible for competition go tournaments. Hope it helps.

This question seems to be a rewording of the below official question: The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclist seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purpose of competition in bicycle races. Which of following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above? a) The market for cheap, traditional bicycle can not expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands. b) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns. c) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purpose of competition. d) The technology conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacturer a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets. e) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.

souvik101990 · Answer

I would encourage you to NOT ask someone else for premises and conclusion. That absolutely blinds your comprehension. How about you try to do it yourself and we can try to identify the gaps (if any)

Here is a compiled resource to identify building blocks in an argument (Part of CR 101 - series)

evdo · Answer

this question is similar to the question about bicycle demands

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

I'll second souvik on this--you tell us what you think the premises and conclusion are! I'll give you a hint: this argument is completely traditional and straightforward in its structure. The part that looks like the conclusion is the conclusion!

(And yes, this is a blatant rewrite of an official Q about bicycles.)

napolean92728 · Answer

The correct answer is:  D. There is not a strong demand for non-competition permissible golf balls generated by competition golfers.

Explanation: 
The  main conclusion  of the argument is:
 
The  reason  provided is that only  competitive golfers  are willing to pay the  high price  needed to cover R&D costs for innovative golf balls.
So, the  assumption  is that  there isn’t enough demand from non-competition golfers (or even competition golfers using non-approved balls)  to justify developing golf balls that are  not allowed  in competitions.
That leads us to  D :

Why the Other Options Are Wrong: 
 A. The slow pace of technological advancement is a consequence of golf ball manufacturers not wanting to manufacture different products for different national markets. 
❌ This brings in  national markets , which are irrelevant to the argument. The argument is about  competition legality vs innovation demand , not market segmentation across countries.

B. Unless the market for balls for competition golfers expands, the market for golf balls for non-competing golfers will not expand. 
❌ This talks about market expansion for non-competing golfers  depending on  the competitive market.
 But the argument is about  R&D limitations  and  demand justification , not about market expansion  dependence .

C. Innovative golf balls are more likely to be developed by small, young manufacturing companies than by industry giants. 
❌ This introduces a point about  who  is developing golf balls (small vs large companies), which is  not relevant  to the reasoning about  why  certain innovations are pursued or not.

E. The authorities who determine what is permissible in competition golf tournaments are not necessarily up-to-date on cutting edge technological improvements. 
❌ This suggests a  problem with the rule-makers , but the argument assumes the rules  exist and are followed  by manufacturers because of  economic demand , not because of the authorities' awareness.

napolean92728 · Answer

The correct answer is:  D. There is not a strong demand for non-competition permissible golf balls generated by competition golfers.

Explanation: 
The  main conclusion  of the argument is:
 
The  reason  provided is that only  competitive golfers  are willing to pay the  high price  needed to cover R&D costs for innovative golf balls.
So, the  assumption  is that  there isn’t enough demand from non-competition golfers (or even competition golfers using non-approved balls)  to justify developing golf balls that are  not allowed  in competitions.
That leads us to  D :

Why the Other Options Are Wrong: 
 A. The slow pace of technological advancement is a consequence of golf ball manufacturers not wanting to manufacture different products for different national markets. 
❌ This brings in  national markets , which are irrelevant to the argument. The argument is about  competition legality vs innovation demand , not market segmentation across countries.

B. Unless the market for balls for competition golfers expands, the market for golf balls for non-competing golfers will not expand. 
❌ This talks about market expansion for non-competing golfers  depending on  the competitive market.
But the argument is about  R&D limitations  and  demand justification , not about market expansion  dependence .

C. Innovative golf balls are more likely to be developed by small, young manufacturing companies than by industry giants. 
❌ This introduces a point about  who  is developing golf balls (small vs large companies), which is  not relevant  to the reasoning about  why  certain innovations are pursued or not.

E. The authorities who determine what is permissible in competition golf tournaments are not necessarily up-to-date on cutting edge technological improvements. 
❌ This suggests a  problem with the rule-makers , but the argument assumes the rules  exist and are followed  by manufacturers because of  economic demand , not because of the authorities' awareness.

The slow advancement of the technology used in golf balls

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

The slow advancement of the technology used in golf balls

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards