gabriel87
Labor laws cannot in and of themselves eliminate the discrepancy between the earnings of union and non-union workers. High-paying occupations are not evenly distributed along union and non-union lines; unionized positions tend to yield higher wages. Therefore, even when labor legislation is rigorously applied, ______________ is the result.
Which one of the following is most appropriate for inclusion in the blank above?
A) a smaller discrepancy between the salaries of union and non-union workers
B) a wider distribution of unionized workers among lower paying jobs
C) an increase in competition for high paying jobs among different non-union groups
D) a comparatively lower earning average for non-union workers
E)a greater financial gain for non-union workers with large salaries
Please help me to understand how the OA is correct.
What is the argument focusing on? Discrepancy between earnings of union and non-union workers. The argument discusses why labor laws cannot eliminate this discrepancy. The unionized positions get higher wages than non unionized positions. So even when labor laws are applied, non union workers earn less than union workers.
A) a smaller discrepancy between the salaries of union and non-union workers
Against our argument so cannot be a part of it.
B) a wider distribution of unionized workers among lower paying jobs.
Argument says nothing of the kind.
C) an increase in competition for high paying jobs among different non-union groups
It probably is true that there is increased competition for high paying jobs but our argument does not talk about that. We are discussing earning discrepancy and trying to establish why labor laws are not effective in dealing with it.
D) a comparatively lower earning average for non-union workers
The argument is trying to explain why labor laws do not eliminate discrepancy so this option is suitable.
E)a greater financial gain for non-union workers with large salaries
Against our argument so cannot be a part of it.
Answer (D)
Can you please explain how come option A is against our argument. Stem says that Labor laws cannot in and of themselves eliminate..... but it can very well reduce the discrepancy between the earnings of unionized and non unionized workers. A also seems a plausible option.