OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Step 1: Identify the Question TypeThe word “assumes” in the question stem signals that this is an Assumption question. We’re looking
for an unstated piece of information that links the evidence to the conclusion. The stem also tells
us that we should focus on the nutritionists’ argument.
Step 2: Untangle the StimulusIn Assumption questions, we first need to find the argument’s conclusion and evidence. The conclusion
is the nutritionists’ prediction: Cheaper Big and Beefy burgers will negatively impact citizens’
health. The evidence is that the Big and Beefy is extremely high in cholesterol and that Burger Land
plans to significantly lower the price of the Big and Beefy.
Step 3: Predict the AnswerThis stimulus contains a scope shift, or change in topic between evidence and conclusion. To spot scope
shifts, look for a brand-new term or idea that appears for the first time in the conclusion without having
been mentioned in the evidence. Here, the conclusion introduces the idea of citizens’ health being
harmed, so we need to figure out why, given the evidence, the author thinks a negative impact on the
population’s health is likely. The author makes two assumptions: (1) that eating a lot of cholesterol is
bad for one’s health, and (2) that the drop in price will entice people to purchase Big and Beefy burgers
instead of lower-cholesterol food they would otherwise have eaten. (For this author’s argument to
work, it’s not enough that Big and Beefy burgers are unhealthy; they’ve got to be less healthy than
the foods they replace.) An answer choice that states either of these assumptions will be correct.
Step 4: Evaluate the Choices(A) matches the second of our predicted assumptions: The reduced price will cause at least some
people to purchase the Big and Beefy rather than other lower-cholesterol foods. This is the correct
answer. (B) falls outside the scope of the argument, which is concerned not with “fat consumption”
but with the very high levels of cholesterol the burgers contain. (C) is incorrect because other
approaches the burger chain could have taken are outside the scope. The argument is concerned
only with the potential consequences of the move they actually made, which was to reduce the price
of one particular burger. (D) is incorrect because other fast-food companies are outside the scope.
We’re interested specifically in Burger Land. Finally, (E) is incorrect because lost revenues at Burger
Land are irrelevant. What is important is the health impact of one specific burger that the company
produces, not the company’s finances. Choice (A) is correct.