generis VeritasKarishma nightblade354 pikolo2510Can you elaborate my understanding based on below PoE?
Quote:
Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?
This is an inference question.
Quote:
Cezanne's art inspired the next generation of artists, twentieth-century modernist creators of abstract art. While most experts rank Cezanne as an early modernist, a small few reject this idea. Francoise Cachin, for example, bluntly states that such an ascription is "overplayed", and says that Cezanne's work is "too often observed from a modern point of view".
C's art inspired next gen of artists. These artists are twentieth-century modernist creators of abstract art.
There is a difference in how experts rank C as early modernist.
90% are in favor, whereas 10% are against it. (or)
51% are in favor, whereas 49% are against it.
Furthermore, to strengthen above point, the author uses example of FC.
As per him, C's work is very often observed as modern art. Ideally it should be not.
Let me know if the above paraphrase is in sync with the argument.
In regular parlance, "most" usually implies at least about 80-90%. "Majority" would imply above 50%. But the answer should not depend on any such distinction.Quote:
A. Cezanne's work is highly controversial.
Why is this incorrect because of approximate %tages I took above?
Do I need to look so closely to noun vs C's work to elimiate this?
The argument does not say that his work is "highly controversial". The controversy is whether he was an early modernist or not and most people believe that he was (making it less controversial).Quote:
B. Cezanne was an early creator of abstract art.
Easy out-1, Subtle difference between inspiring x and creating x.
Quote:
C. Cezanne's work helped to develop modernism.
I crossed out this based on the below part from the argument:
While most experts rank Cezanne as an early modernist, a small few reject this idea.Had I been told to identify main conclusion of the argument, this would be it.
I think I faltered to distinguish subtly between author's opinion and something that I
need to infer (I always fall in to trap that an inference, much like an assumption, is never
explicitly stated)
The argument mentions - - Cezanne's art inspired the next generation of artists, twentieth-century modernist creators of abstract art. Many consider him an early modernist so modernist creations were not common before him. So in any case, he did help develop modernism (by inspiring modernist creators). Answer (C)Quote:
D. Modern art owes less to Cezanne than many experts believe.
Invalid comparison between C and other artists, completely out of scope. Easy out-2
Quote:
E. Cezanne's work tends to be misinterpreted as modernist.
I selected this as my answer, since just as (C) I feel (E) is point which author wants to
make. But how come C and E are opposite to each other?
The argument says that most experts rank him as an early modernist. The argument does not say that they are wrong. So we cannot conclude that his work is "misinterpreted" as modernist.I am too confused about A, C and E and want a better explanation than focussing on noun - C
and possessive pronoun C's work to perform PoE. Let me put subject of these three options together
to understand how the verb is placed for all three:
C' art:
Quote:
is highly controversial.
yes, can be infered because of huge %tage difference as explained in my paraphrasing.
Quote:
helped to develop modernism.
yes, this is author's main opinion / claim
Quote:
tends to be misinterpreted as modernist.
is not this overall tone of the argument? Though only a few reject C as a modernist
the fact remains that there are two views about C's work. How do I eliminate this with confidence?
Looking forward for your two cents.