Superg8
Can some one please explain this answer in detail
Hey
Superg8 ,
Here I go:
Let's understand the argument first.
Conclusion: The black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development.
Premise 1: Originally moth were white but then mutants enjoyed some competitive survival advantage.
Premise 2: In City Y, since there isn't any factory, all moths are white.
I will pick 2nd boldface first because I know 2nd boldface isn't a conclusion and it is just supporting what is author talking about (Evolutionary Development).
My first cycle which reject all answer choices that are talking wrong about 2nd Boldface.
A The first is the argument's main conclusion; the second suggests
an exception to that conclusion. -->
2nd is rather supporting author's point. It is no where an exception.B The first is evidence in support of the argument's main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an
alternative, rejected conclusion. -->
Conclusion is not rejected. C The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion;
the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion. --> 2nd Boldface seems correct here
D The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion;
the second is evidence in support of the argument's main conclusion. --> 2nd Boldface seems correct here
E They are both
evidence offered in
support of a conclusion that is rejected. -->
Conclusion is not rejected. Now, I will focus on the 1st bolface part of the leftover options.
C The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion;D The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an
alternate conclusion;
--> There is no alternate conclusion.
Hence, by POE I am left with only option C. Hence, C is correct.
Does that make sense?