Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 12:01 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 12:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gnpth
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Last visit: 03 Mar 2023
Posts: 1,039
Own Kudos:
6,774
 [19]
Given Kudos: 330
Status:Chasing my MBB Dream!
Location: United States (DC)
WE:General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Posts: 1,039
Kudos: 6,774
 [19]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
david2099
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 05 Nov 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Products:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Poorvasha
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 57
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,882
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Poorvasha
Gnpth
Hightrail Park, a state park popular amongst weekend hikers, is suffering erosion along its trails. The primary cause are the many hikers, who looking for a quicker route between the switchbacks, cut between trails, thereby trampling undergrowth. Without grass and weeds, the land abutting the trails is more prone to erosion. To combat this problem, state park officials have placed yellow tape on those parts of the trail where erosion is most significant. State park officials expect that the park will not witness any erosion more extreme than what the park is currently witnessing.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Hikers who hike between trails tend to hike along a similar route, thereby making erosion more likely in certain areas along the trail.
B. Hikers who hike during the week are not as likely to walk on the land between the switchbacks.
C. Erosion in the state park can be caused by other factors such as significant rainfall.
D. The yellow tape at higher altitudes along the trail, where weather is more severe, will fall apart at the same rate as the yellow tape located at lower altitudes.
E. Those parts along the trail that do not qualify as being highly eroded will not in the next five years become more eroded than those parts along the trail that are currently the most eroded.

Hi mikemcgarry,

Can you please explain why A is incorrect here.

Also, would A have been correct if it would have said that Hikers who hiked along a similar route might now take alternative routes that are not covered with yellow tape between trails ?

Thanks in advance! :-)
Dear Poorvasha,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Remember, one standard check for an assumption is the Negation Test: if we can negate the statement and the argument more or less still works, then that statement is not an assumption; conversely, if negating a statement devastates an argument, that statement is an assumption.

Let's suppose that (A) is false. Let's say that
Hikers who hike between trails tend to hike along different routes, spreading out their impact.
That's the negation of (A). Would this lead to more erosion or less? Hard to say. I could see an argument either way, and when the argument could go either way, what we have is inconclusive. Because this is inconclusive, we can't call (A) an assumption.

Adding in the part about places with or without yellow tape doesn't change this. We don't know whether these changes would result more or less erosion, and because it's unclear, we don't have a bonafide assumption.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,054
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,054
Kudos: 2,195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hightrail Park, a state park popular amongst weekend hikers, is suffering erosion along its trails. The primary cause are the many hikers, who looking for a quicker route between the switchbacks, cut between trails, thereby trampling undergrowth. Without grass and weeds, the land abutting the trails is more prone to erosion. To combat this problem, state park officials have placed yellow tape on those parts of the trail where erosion is most significant. State park officials expect that the park will not witness any erosion more extreme than what the park is currently witnessing.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Hikers who hike between trails tend to hike along a similar route, thereby making erosion more likely in certain areas along the trail. -The trails have been blocked by the government, so this is out of scope.
B. Hikers who hike during the week are not as likely to walk on the land between the switchbacks. -Okay? What about the other hikers?
C. Erosion in the state park can be caused by other factors such as significant rainfall. -Natural disasters can't be controlled.
D. The yellow tape at higher altitudes along the trail, where weather is more severe, will fall apart at the same rate as the yellow tape located at lower altitudes. -Irrelevant
E. Those parts along the trail that do not qualify as being highly eroded will not in the next five years become more eroded than those parts along the trail that are currently the most eroded. -Correct. If the other parts don't erode then the conclusion sustains.
User avatar
Harish_Krishnan
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option E. the scope is only 5 years. Whereas the conclusion says: "will not witness any erosion more extreme". What if the less eroded parts become more eroded in 6 or 7 years instead of in the next 5. I will still witness "more extreme" erosion right?
gmatexam439
Hightrail Park, a state park popular amongst weekend hikers, is suffering erosion along its trails. The primary cause are the many hikers, who looking for a quicker route between the switchbacks, cut between trails, thereby trampling undergrowth. Without grass and weeds, the land abutting the trails is more prone to erosion. To combat this problem, state park officials have placed yellow tape on those parts of the trail where erosion is most significant. State park officials expect that the park will not witness any erosion more extreme than what the park is currently witnessing.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Hikers who hike between trails tend to hike along a similar route, thereby making erosion more likely in certain areas along the trail. -The trails have been blocked by the government, so this is out of scope.
B. Hikers who hike during the week are not as likely to walk on the land between the switchbacks. -Okay? What about the other hikers?
C. Erosion in the state park can be caused by other factors such as significant rainfall. -Natural disasters can't be controlled.
D. The yellow tape at higher altitudes along the trail, where weather is more severe, will fall apart at the same rate as the yellow tape located at lower altitudes. -Irrelevant
E. Those parts along the trail that do not qualify as being highly eroded will not in the next five years become more eroded than those parts along the trail that are currently the most eroded. -Correct. If the other parts don't erode then the conclusion sustains.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts