QZ
Akela
The government health service has said that it definitely will not pay for patients to take the influenza medicine Antinfia until the drug's manufacturer, PharmCo, provides detailed information about Antinfia's cost effectiveness. PharmCo has responded that obtaining such information would require massive clinical trials. These trials cannot be performed until the drug is in widespread circulation, something that will happen only if the goverrunent health service pays for Antinfia.
If the statements of both the government health service and PharmCo are true, which one of the following is most likely to also be true?
(A) The goverrunent health service never pays for any medicine unless that medicine has been shown to be cost-effective.
(B) Antinfia will never be in widespread circulation.
(C) If the government health service does not pay for Antinfia, then many patients will pay for Antinfia themselves.
(D) The government health service should pay for patients to take Antinfia.
(E) Antinfia is not cost-effective.
Source: LSAT
Not able to understand and infer properly. Though this is an LSAT question, there must me correct reasoning for the right answer.
Please help and also let us know whether such questions can be tested on GMAT or not.
VeritasPrepKarishma,
GMATNinjaYes, the reasoning is proper.
Argument tells us:
- Govt says it will not pay for Antinfia until PharmCo provides details on cost effectiveness.
- PharmCo says it can provide these details only if the Govt pays for Antinfia.
So basically they are caught in a circle. Hence, if both these statements are assumed to be true, the Govt will not pay for Antinfia and it will never be in widespread circulation (since the Govt needs to pay for it to be in widespread circulation). So (B) is correct.
(A) The goverrunent health service never pays for any medicine unless that medicine has been shown to be cost-effective.
We don't know this. We only know that they have refused to pay for Antinfia until its cost effectiveness is proven.
(C) If the government health service does not pay for Antinfia, then many patients will pay for Antinfia themselves.
We don't know what patients will do. Out of scope.
(D) The government health service should pay for patients to take Antinfia.
Should or should not is not our call. We need to find what is true according to argument.
(E) Antinfia is not cost-effective.
The argument doesn't say that. PharmCo just needs widespread circulation to prove that it is cost-effective.