The caffeine in coffee stimulates the production of irritating acid in the stomach. But darker roasts of coffee, produced by roasting the coffee beans longer, contain more N-methylpyridinium (NMP) than lighter roasts, and NMP tends to suppress production of acid in the stomach. Therefore if you drink caffeinated coffee, darker roasts will irritate your stomach less than lighter roasts.The conclusion of the argument is the following:
if you drink caffeinated coffee, darker roasts will irritate your stomach less than lighter roastsThe support for the conclusion is the following:
darker roasts of coffee, produced by roasting the coffee beans longer, contain more N-methylpyridinium (NMP) than lighter roasts, and NMP tends to suppress production of acid in the stomach So, the reasoning of the argument is basically that, since darker roasts contain more NMP than lighter roasts, darker roasts will irritate your stomach less than lighter roasts because the greater amount of NMP in darker roasts will do more to counteract the acid-production-stimulating effect of the caffeine.
The answer to which one of the following questions most helps in evaluating the argument?This is an Evaluate question, and the correct answer will be the choice such that an answer to the question presented by the choice will weaken or strengthen the argument.
(A) Does extending the roasting time of coffee beans increase the amount of caffeine present in the brewed coffee?This choice is interesting.
The passage indicates that "caffeine in coffee stimulates the production of irritating acid in the stomach."
It then says that darker roast coffee contains more NMP, a substance that counteracts the effect of caffeine because NMP "tends to suppress the production of acid."
But what if the answer to this question is "Yes," and extending the roasting time of coffee beans does increase the amount of caffeine present in the brewed coffee.
In that case, darker roast coffee not only contains more NMP, which tends to suppress production of acid, but also contains more caffeine, which stimulates production of acid.
So, in that case, it's not clear that darker roast coffee is less irritating since the acid-production-stimulating effect of the additional caffeine in darker roast coffee offsets the acid-production-suppressing effect of the additional NMP.
Thus, a "Yes" answer to this question casts doubt on the conclusion.
Also, a "No" answer to this question helps to support the conclusion by serving to rule out the possibility that there's additional caffeine in darker roast coffee that will make it just as irritating as lighter roasts even though it contains more NMP than lighter roasts.
So, since different answers to this question weaken or strengthen the argument, the answer to this question helps in evaluating the argument.
Keep.
(B) Does a reduction in acid production in the stomach have an adverse effect on stomach function?Neither a "Yes" nor a "No" answer to this question weakens or strengthens the argument since the conclusion of the argument is not about "stomach" function.
In other words, since the effect on stomach function of a reduction in acid doesn't affect how much irritating acid is produced, the answer to this question has no effect on the argument.
Eliminate.
(C) Would coffee drinkers who drink caffeinated coffee increase their coffee consumption if the coffee they drank contained less caffeine?The answer to this question has no effect on the argument.
After all, the argument is about darker and lighter roasts of coffee, not about coffee that contains more or less caffeine.
Regardless of whether people would drink more coffee if the coffee they drank contained less caffeine, darker roast coffee may be less irritating.
Eliminate.
(D) Do some coffee drinkers who switch from lighter to darker roasts of coffee increase their daily coffee consumption?This choice is a tricky because the answer could seem to weaken or strengthen the case for the conclusion.
After all, presumably, increasing coffee consumption will result in increased stomach irritation. So, we could get the impression that this choice is correct because a "Yes" answer to this question means that drinking a darker roast of coffee may result in just as much irritation as drinking a lighter roast because people will drink more of a darker roast. So, a "Yes" answer to this choice could seem to weaken the case for the conclusion of the argument.
At the same time, this choice is not correct for the following reason.
The conclusion is not that, in general, people drinking darker roasts of coffee will experience less stomach irritation. The conclusion is "if you drink caffeinated coffee, darker roasts will irritate your stomach less than lighter roasts."
So, the conclusion is about what a darker roast itself does. It's not about how much stomach irritation people who drink each type of coffee can be expected to experience. In other words, the point is that darker roast coffee is less irritating. It's not that all people who drink darker roast coffee have less irritation.
Maybe some people who switch to darker roast coffee drink more and experience increased irritation, but that outcome doesn't occur because darker roast coffee is more irritating. It occurs because some people drink more of it.
So, information on whether people who switch from darker to lighter roasts increase their coffee consumption has no effect on the argument because that information does not indicate how the irritation caused by darker roast coffee compares with that caused by lighter roast coffee.
Eliminate.
(E) Do lighter roasts of coffee have any important health benefits that darker roasts of coffee lack?The answer to this question neither weakens nor strengthens the argument because the conclusion of the argument is not about "health benefits." It's simply about how much coffee will "irritate your stomach."
So, information health benefits does not have an effect on the case for the conclusion.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: A