SlowTortoise
I eliminated (B) because the argument doesn't mention that gaseous substances given off the the human skin/arm are the ONLY possible way to attract mosquitoes. The conclusion mentions that there is an ancillary factor that draws mosquitoes to the human body.
Even if mosquitoes are attracted to human body by other gaseous substances, they could still be attracted to the human body by body heat.
Could an expert please give his or her POV on B, D, and E.
Here's an explanation for the question.
Human skin gives off an array of gaseous substances, including carbon dioxide and lactic acid, both of which attract mosquitoes. However, neither of these two substances, whether alone or combined with one another, will attract mosquitoes as much as a bare human arm will, even in complete darkness, where a mosquito has no visual cues. Therefore, some other gaseous substance given off by human skin also attracts mosquitoes.The conclusion of the argument is the following:
some other gaseous substance given off by human skin also attracts mosquitoes
The support for the conclusion is this premise:
neither of these two substances (carbon dioxide and lactic acid), whether alone or combined with one another, will attract mosquitoes as much as a bare human arm will, even in complete darkness, where a mosquito has no visual cues
We see that the author has reasoned that, since a human arm in darkness attracts mosquitoes more than carbon dioxide and lactic acid do, some gaseous substance in addition to carbon dioxide and lactic acid must be given off by the human arm.
The reasoning in the argument requires which one of the following assumptions?The correct answer is an assumption that the author must make in order for the premise to support the conclusion.
(A) Mosquitoes do not communicate with one another.The argument still works even if this choice isn't true. After all, even if mosquitoes do communicate with one another, they could still be more attracted to human skin than to carbon dioxide and lactic acid because human skin gives off other gaseous substance.
Eliminate.
(B) Mosquitoes are not attracted to humans by body heat.In the argument, the author goes from the fact that a human arm in darkness attracts mosquitoes more than carbon dioxide and lactic acid to the conclusion that some other gaseous substance given off by human skin also attracts mosquitoes.
In going from that evidence to that conclusion, the author has made the general assumption that there is not something other than gaseous substances that could be attracting mosquitoes to human skin. After all, if something other than gaseous substances attracts mosquitoes, then the conclusion doesn't follow from the evidence since it's doesn't have to be the case that some other gaseous substance attracts mosquitoes if there is something else that attracts mosquitoes to human skin.
One example of something else that could attract mosquitoes is body heat. If body heat attracts mosquitoes, then it doesn't have to be the case that some other gaseous substance that attracts mosquitoes is given off by human skin. Rather, it could be the case that the reason a human arm in darkness attracts mosquitoes more than carbon dioxide and lactic acid is that a human arm gives off heat.
So, the argument requires the assumption that "Mosquitoes are not attracted to humans by body heat."
Keep.
(C) Human skin gives off gaseous substances in greater amounts during the day than during the night.The argument doesn't require assuming any difference between what human skin does during the day and what human skin does during the night. Darkness is mentioned in the argument only to show that mosquitoes are not using vision to find human skin, and regardless of any comparison between what human skin does during the day and what human skin does during the night, it still follows that, if mosquitoes cannot see the arm, then they must be going to it for some other reason, such as that they are attracted by gaseous substances.
Eliminate.
(D) Mosquitoes are no more successful in finding a bare human arm in darkness than in light.Notice that, even if this choice is not true, and mosquitoes ARE more successful in finding a bare human arm in darkness than in light, there is still some reason why they are attracted to a human arm in darkness.
So, the argument works even if this choice is not true.
Eliminate.
(E) Human skin never gives off any gaseous substances that repel mosquitoes.Even if human skin DOES sometimes give off gaseous substances that repel mosquitoes, the fact that mosquitoes are more attracted to a human arm than to carbon dioxide and lactic acid still supports the conclusion of the argument. After all, something is causing mosquitoes to be attracted to a human arm.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is (B).