The public square was an important tool of democracy in days past because it provided a forum for disparate citizens to discuss the important issues of the day. Today, a person with Internet access can discuss important issues with millions of people across the nation, allowing the Internet to play the role once played by the public square. Hence, we should ensure that Internet users have at least as much freedom of expression as did people speaking in the public square.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
(A) People speaking in the public square of days past
had complete freedom of expression. - WRONG. Even if they didn't had that complete freedom it would not have mattered since we are still not sure whether today's generation has that level of FoE. Whether it was complete or minute level of FoE it does not matter. The relativeness between the two generations's FoE is what matters.
(B)
All citizens have the
same level of access to the Internet. - WRONG. Nothing about FoE. Not necessarily required.
(C) A public forum
can lose effectiveness as a tool of democracy
if participants cannot discuss issues freely. - CORRECT. Best among the lot but still i have apprehensions about this one.
(D) The Internet is more often used to discuss important issues than to
discuss frivolous issues. - WRONG. Diversion thus irrelevant.
(E) Other than the Internet,
no other public forum today is an important tool of democracy. - WRONG. Other forum is irrelevant.
Answer C.