Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:06 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AshutoshB
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
2,320
 [24]
Given Kudos: 348
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 322
Kudos: 2,320
 [24]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mansoor50
Joined: 29 May 2017
Last visit: 04 Jul 2021
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Posts: 139
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
adstudy
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Last visit: 15 Dec 2023
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
438
 [1]
Given Kudos: 270
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Posts: 248
Kudos: 438
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SPatel1992
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Last visit: 14 Aug 2020
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 297
Posts: 63
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused between A and C. They both sound the same. Can somebody explain?
User avatar
XyLan
User avatar
ESMT Berlin School Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Last visit: 15 Apr 2026
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
489
 [3]
Given Kudos: 104
Status:The darker the night, the nearer the dawn!
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 240
Kudos: 489
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AshutoshB
Outsiders in any field often believe that they can bring in fresh, useful solutions that have been overlooked by insiders. But in fact, attempts at creativity that are not grounded in relevant experience are futile. Problems can be solved only by people who really understand them, and no one gains such understanding without experience.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) The more experience a person has in a field, the more creatively that person can solve problems in the field.
(B) Those people who are experienced in a field rarely overlook creative solutions.
(C) Creative solutions in a field always come from people with experience in that field.
(D) The experience required for effective problem-solving in a field does not vary depending on the field's complexity.
(E) Outsiders should be properly trained in a field before being given responsibility in that field.

LSAT

SPatel1992
I am confused between A and C. They both sound the same. Can somebody explain?
ravi546, Let's deep-dive!

Argument states:
    1) Outsiders in any field often believe that they can bring in fresh, useful solutions that have been overlooked by insiders.
      Outsiders believe they CAN bring CUS (creative useful solutions).
    2) But in fact, attempts at the creativity that are not grounded in relevant experience are futile.
      However, the author discards this view.
    3) Problems can be solved only by people who really understand them, and no one gains such an understanding without experience.
      He states that to bring a novel solution, one MUST have understanding, which comes through experience in that field.

Focus on what the author states:
    An experienced person is better suited to bring CUS (creative useful solutions) than an outsider ( NonExpPerson )
      because an experienced person understands the sitaution at hand through experience.

Answer choice analysis:
    Quote:
    (A) The more experience a person has in a field, the more creatively that person can solve problems in the field.
      It plays with probability, NOT certainty.
      The argument suggests: An ExpPerson is better than a NonExpPerson.
      Nowhere it states that higher the experience, more are the chances of creativity. - The proportionality is NEVER discussed.
    Quote:
    (B) Those people who are experienced in a field rarely overlook creative solutions.
      Went TOO far. The ExpPerson almost ALWAYS comes up with CUS (creative useful solutions). - A strong claim, which we CANNOT substantiate from the passage.
    Quote:
    (C) Creative solutions in a field always come from people with experience in that field.
      Aha! - Exactly what we thought!
      - Do not worry about the usage of "always". If a thought is coherent with the passage. one MUST not discard it immediately. Let's keep it.
    Quote:
    (D) The experience required for effective problem-solving in a field does not vary depending on the field's complexity.
      The perspective of whether the Experience varies with Field's complexity is OUT of scope.
    Quote:
    (E) Outsiders should be properly trained in a field before being given responsibility in that field.
      The perspective of whether the Outsiders should be trained ... is OUT of scope.
User avatar
rvgmat12
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Last visit: 27 Mar 2026
Posts: 352
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 189
Location: United Arab Emirates
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From Manhattan Forum:

Question Type:
Inference (Most Strongly Supported)

Stimulus Breakdown:
No experience → No creative solutions
Solve a problem → True understanding
No experience → No true understanding

Answer Anticipation:
It's uncommon to see conditional logic in a Most Strongly Supported question (other than Principle Inference questions), but when it's there, it's there.

I'd skip the first statement since there are 3 "all" statements, so I'm expecting my inference to come from a combination there - stronger statements are more able to lead to inferences. I'll circle back if needed.

A lot of these statements have overlap that can't be combined (as an example, the first and third conditionals share a Sufficient condition, so they can't be chained). However, I can take the contrapositive of the third to combine it with the second:
Solve a problem → True understanding → Experience
and the contrapositive of that
No experience → Can't solve problem

I'm expecting one of those to be the correct answer.

Correct answer:
(C)

Answer choice analysis:
(A) Unwarranted comparison. The argument talks about having or not having experience; it doesn't compare more experience to less experience.

(B) Illegal negation of the first statement (also, a degree shift to "rarely", though we can shift down and still make an inference).

(C) Bingo. This answer is the contrapositive of the first conditional. I wasn't expecting this (I was expecting to need to combine two conditionals to get my answer), but I can infer this statement (Creative solutions → Experience). I'd check the others to be sure, though.

(D) Out of scope/unwarranted comparison. The conditionals do speak to all fields, but it's still possible that the required experience is different in each field, as long as that level of experience is reached.

(E) Out of scope. I'd dump this answer with "should", as normative language isn't a part of the argument.

Takeaway/Pattern:
Some Inference questions will rely on a single statement to lead to the answer, even if you can make an inference based on a combination of statements.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts