Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 21:06 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 21:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
6,350
 [21]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,350
 [21]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Mohitstarc
Joined: 26 Nov 2018
Last visit: 28 Oct 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
6,350
 [2]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,350
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pranavsawant
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 326
Location: India
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
GPA: 3.99
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
Posts: 89
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is entirely possible that ebola is a contagious disease and was spread through humans instead of the host animal in the place of the epidemic. Let's say the host animal of the virus was located in Italy. A traveller got infected with the ebola virus in Italy and then visited Greece. He then transferred it to people of Greece via social contact which led to the epidemic. What I'm trying to say is that the presence or absence of the host animal in the location of the country does in no way weaken the argument. So C is also a valid option.

Are we sure this is an LSAT question? It's hard for me to believe that an LSAT question would assume that the host animal needs to be in the country for the virus to spread.
User avatar
WhitEngagePrep
Joined: 12 Nov 2024
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: United States
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 58
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pranavsawant
It is entirely possible that ebola is a contagious disease and was spread through humans instead of the host animal in the place of the epidemic. Let's say the host animal of the virus was located in Italy. A traveller got infected with the ebola virus in Italy and then visited Greece. He then transferred it to people of Greece via social contact which led to the epidemic. What I'm trying to say is that the presence or absence of the host animal in the location of the country does in no way weaken the argument. So C is also a valid option.

Are we sure this is an LSAT question? It's hard for me to believe that an LSAT question would assume that the host animal needs to be in the country for the virus to spread.
Be careful! I "weaken" doesn't have to destroy an argument, just make you somewhat more suspicious of it!

Also, yes, this is an LSAT question - it's from the 2011 Test 63 (Section 1, Question 7.

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
User avatar
Pranavsawant
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 326
Location: India
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
GPA: 3.99
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
Posts: 89
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Restating the options here for reference:

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument EXCEPT:

(A) Victims of the Ebola virus experience many symptoms that do not appear in any of the accounts of the Athenian epidemic.
(B) Not all of those who are victims of the Ebola virus are afflicted with hiccups.
(C) The Ebola virus’s host animals did not live in Athens at the time of the Athenian epidemic.
(D) The Ebola virus is much more contagious than the disease that caused the Athenian epidemic was reported to have been.
(E) The epidemics known to have been caused by the Ebola virus are usually shorter-lived than was the Athenian epidemic.

Okay yeah you have a valid point there. Option B states that there are >= 1 people who haave the ebola and don't have hiccups. This is in line with what the passage says when it mentions that many (not all) of the victims reported hiccups. This means that there were some victims who didn;t have hiccups. So B is very well in line with the passage and doesn't weaken it. Nice question!
Requires a bit more careful analysis :)
WhitEngagePrep
Pranavsawant
It is entirely possible that ebola is a contagious disease and was spread through humans instead of the host animal in the place of the epidemic. Let's say the host animal of the virus was located in Italy. A traveller got infected with the ebola virus in Italy and then visited Greece. He then transferred it to people of Greece via social contact which led to the epidemic. What I'm trying to say is that the presence or absence of the host animal in the location of the country does in no way weaken the argument. So C is also a valid option.

Are we sure this is an LSAT question? It's hard for me to believe that an LSAT question would assume that the host animal needs to be in the country for the virus to spread.
Be careful! I "weaken" doesn't have to destroy an argument, just make you somewhat more suspicious of it!

Also, yes, this is an LSAT question - it's from the 2011 Test 63 (Section 1, Question 7.

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 676
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,485
Location: India
Posts: 676
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Victims of the Ebola virus experience many symptoms that do not appear in any of the accounts of the Athenian epidemic.
Weakens, the author is concluding on the basis of hiccups and some other symptoms but if many symptoms didn't appear then it reduces the belief that it was the Ebola virus.

(B) Not all of those who are victims of the Ebola virus are afflicted with hiccups.
Doesn't weaken, this option actually repeats the fact given to us. We are given "Accounts of the epidemic mention the hiccups experienced by many victims..", this itself means that "Not all" victims were affected.

(C) The Ebola virus’s host animals did not live in Athens at the time of the Athenian epidemic.
Weakens, if source of the virus is not present in the region then it reduces the belief in the argument that it was Ebola virus.

(D) The Ebola virus is much more contagious than the disease that caused the Athenian epidemic was reported to have been.
Weakens, this reduces the belief because the impact would have been more devastating than what had happened.

(E) The epidemics known to have been caused by the Ebola virus are usually shorter-lived than was the Athenian epidemic.
Weakens, this reduces the belief because the impact would have been less devastating than what had happened.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts