Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 00:29 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 00:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akanshaxo
Joined: 15 Feb 2016
Last visit: 30 May 2020
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
300
 [4]
Given Kudos: 39
Status:Preparing
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: ISB '20
Schools: ISB '20
Posts: 32
Kudos: 300
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aashraiarun
Joined: 17 Mar 2018
Last visit: 16 Aug 2024
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 225
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AjjayKannan
Joined: 26 Dec 2018
Last visit: 23 Nov 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 18
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mykrasovski
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2022
Posts: 340
Own Kudos:
325
 [1]
Given Kudos: 253
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 340
Kudos: 325
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aashraiarun, think about the conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is in the first sentence - the city claims that it made a mistake when it sold the rights.

So, if you negate answer choice B - "the city could NOT have raised parking fees had it not sold the rights", then it attacks the conclusion of the argument. In other words, if no money could be raised, then selling the rights is not a mistake (while the conclusion says that selling was a mistake).

Hope it helps.
avatar
rebecca501
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 06 Oct 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 10
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: The private company was able to reap profits far greater than what it paid by raising parking fees.

Conclusion: The city made a mistake by selling the rights to assess and collect the parking fees to the private company because the money would have gone to the city instead.

Assumption: The city would have raised the parking fees had it not sold the rights to the private company.
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,902
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,902
Kudos: 5,456
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
akanshaxo
Pundit: Our city made a mistake when it sold a private company the rights to assess and collect parking fees. The private company raised parking fees and so has been able to reap profits far greater than what it paid for the rights to assess and collect the fees.lf the city had not sold the rights, then that money would have gone to the city.

The pundit's argument requires the assumption that:


(A) other private companies would have been willing to pay for the rights to assess and collect parking fees

(B) the city could have raised parking fees had it not sold the rights

(C) municipal functions like assessing and collecting parking fees should always be handled directly by the municipality in question

(D) the revenue from parking fees is not the only factor that cities need to consider in setting the rates for parking fees

(E) private companies assess and collect parking fees more efficiently than cities do

The best strategy in my opinion will be challenging the highlighted part of the stimulus!!!!

Selling rights ---------------> Collection of parking fees.

Option (B) correctly states the same , negating the option shatters the conclusion, hence Answer must be (B)
avatar
goyalshanu
Joined: 15 Jan 2018
Last visit: 31 Jul 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aashraiarun
If i negate B, the argument doesn't break. It gets strengthened. So how is B the answer? Can anyone explain?


You have answered your question yourself. If on negation, an answer choice shatters the conclusion, then it would strengthen the conclusion. Or we can say, it is the assumption on which the argument is based. So, (B) is the correct choice.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,426
Own Kudos:
1,010
 [1]
Posts: 19,426
Kudos: 1,010
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts