Montyyy95
GMATNinja do we solve LSAT CR questions to prepare for GMAT ?
And if possible could you give an explanation for this question?
Posted from my mobile device Using LSAT questions to prep for the GMAT is definitely worth considering, as I've explained in
this blog post.
This particular question is a good example of a question that's more difficult than you'd expect to see on the GMAT, but let's go ahead and unpack what the passage is telling us:
Quote:
Most people who are skilled banjo players are also skilled guitar players. But most people who are skilled guitar players are not skilled banjo players.
Ouch! This is a brain-hurting scenario for sure, so it'll help to use simple numbers to create a logical sketch of this scenario.
Let's say that there are 100 skilled guitar players. "Most" of them are NOT skilled banjo players, so we'll say for the sake of illustration that among these 100 skilled guitar players, 20% of them are skilled banjo players and 80% of them are NOT skilled banjo players.
So far, we've got:
- 80 players skilled at guitar
- 20 players skilled at guitar + banjo
We also know that
most skilled banjo players are also skilled guitar players. And in this scenario, we've already identified 20 skilled banjo players who are
also skilled guitar players. So in our sketch, the 20 players who are skilled at both instruments must represent most (i.e., 80%) of all skilled banjo players.
Consequently, we shouldn't expect to find more than 5 skilled banjo players in addition to these 20. Now we've got:
- 80 players skilled at guitar
- 20 players skilled at guitar + banjo
- 5 players skilled at banjo
Now, the 80% figure we've assigned to "most" is arbitrary. But it illustrates the logical meaning of "most." We can change this number to 70%, or 60%, or even 51% to illustrate these groups — and we'd end up with the same logical observation: There are more skilled guitar players than skilled banjo players in this scenario.
This matches answer choice (D):
Quote:
(D) There are more people who are skilled at playing the guitar than there are people who are skilled at playing the banjo.
Now, let's double check each other answer choice.
Quote:
(A) There are more people who are skilled at playing both the guitar and the banjo than there are people who are skilled at playing only one of the two instruments.
Nope! Given the proportions that this passage has provided, there's no way this can also be true. Eliminate (A).
Quote:
(B) A person trying to learn how to play the guitar is more likely to succeed in doing so than is a person trying to learn how to play the banjo.
A person trying to learn how to play the guitar is more likely to succeed in doing so than is a person trying to learn how to play the banjo.[/quote]
The passage doesn't give us any information about people
trying to learn guitar or banjo. It only tells us about people who are
already skilled at one or both of these instruments. Because we have no idea how many people tried to learn guitar or banjo, we can't infer anything about how likely they were to succeed at learning that skill.
Perhaps a ton of people tried learning the guitar and failed before they became "skilled players"... or perhaps the opposite is true, and many people tried to learn the guitar and did not succeed in that endeavor.
We can't infer how likely people were to succeed in learning either instrument, so eliminate (B).
Quote:
(C) Playing the guitar takes more skill than playing the banjo does.
There is no information in the passage to support this statement. We don't know
why the distribution of skilled banjo and guitar players turned out this way... and if anything, the passage makes it seem like playing the
banjo takes more skill than playing the guitar. Eliminate (C).
Quote:
(E) There are more people who are skilled at playing the banjo than there are people who are skilled at playing the guitar.
As with choice (A), a quick look at our sketch shows that this can't possibly be true. Eliminate (D).
(D) stands as the only answer supported by the passage. I hope this helps!