Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
12 Mar 2019, 01:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
69% (02:17) correct
31%
(02:20)
wrong
based on 680
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Mark: Plastic-foam cups, which contain environmentally harmful chlorofluorocarbons, should no longer be used; paper cups are preferable. Styrene, a carcinogenic by-product, is generated in foam production, and foam cups, once used, persist indefinitely in the environment.
Tina: You overlook the environmental effects of paper cups. A study done 5 years ago showed that making paper for their production burned more petroleum than was used for foam cups and used 12 times as much steam, 36 times as much electricity, and twice as much cooling water. Because paper cups weigh more, their transportation takes more energy. Paper mills produce water pollution, and when the cups decay they produce methane, a gas that contributes to harmful global warming. So they are a worse choice.
To decide the issue between Mark and Tina, it would first be most important to decide
(A) how soon each of the kinds of harm cited by Mark and Tina would be likely to be at its maximum level
(B) whether members of some societies use, on average, more disposable goods than do members of other societies
(C) whether it is necessary to seek a third alternative that has none of the negative consequences cited with respect to the two products
(D) how much of the chains of causation involved in the production, marketing, and disposal of the products should be considered in analyzing their environmental impact
(E) whether paper and foam cups, in their most popular sizes, hold the same quantities of liquid
Tina: You overlook the environmental effects of paper cups. A study done 5 years ago showed that making paper for their production burned more petroleum than was used for foam cups and used 12 times as much steam, 36 times as much electricity, and twice as much cooling water. Because paper cups weigh more, their transportation takes more energy. Paper mills produce water pollution, and when the cups decay they produce methane, a gas that contributes to harmful global warming. So they are a worse choice.
To decide the issue between Mark and Tina, it would first be most important to decide
(A) how soon each of the kinds of harm cited by Mark and Tina would be likely to be at its maximum level
(B) whether members of some societies use, on average, more disposable goods than do members of other societies
(C) whether it is necessary to seek a third alternative that has none of the negative consequences cited with respect to the two products
(D) how much of the chains of causation involved in the production, marketing, and disposal of the products should be considered in analyzing their environmental impact
(E) whether paper and foam cups, in their most popular sizes, hold the same quantities of liquid
09 Apr 2019, 10:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Please explain this.
Shouldn't it be C?If there is third alternative necessary then we will go for that.If not,then we will settle the argument between Mike and Tina.
Shouldn't it be C?If there is third alternative necessary then we will go for that.If not,then we will settle the argument between Mike and Tina.
09 Apr 2019, 10:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
Note that the conclusion is: using paper cup is "a worse choice" => must find an answer base on which we can say which one is better, which one is worse
(A) how soon each of the kinds of harm cited by Mark and Tina would be likely to be at its maximum level => When the harms of each kind reached the maximum level does not point out which one is better to use
(B) whether members of some societies use, on average, more disposable goods than do members of other societies => not related to conclusion
(C) whether it is necessary to seek a third alternative that has none of the negative consequences cited with respect to the two products => Whether or not can find a third alternative, there's no base to state one kind is a better use than another
(D) how much of the chains of causation involved in the production, marketing, and disposal of the products should be considered in analyzing their environmental impact => this raises question on the way of measuring the environmental effects of the 2 kinds of cups, which, if clarified will help determine which kind of cup will cause more harm, and thus be the worse choice --- CORRECT
(E) whether paper and foam cups, in their most popular sizes, hold the same quantities of liquid => not related to conclusion
(A) how soon each of the kinds of harm cited by Mark and Tina would be likely to be at its maximum level => When the harms of each kind reached the maximum level does not point out which one is better to use
(B) whether members of some societies use, on average, more disposable goods than do members of other societies => not related to conclusion
(C) whether it is necessary to seek a third alternative that has none of the negative consequences cited with respect to the two products => Whether or not can find a third alternative, there's no base to state one kind is a better use than another
(D) how much of the chains of causation involved in the production, marketing, and disposal of the products should be considered in analyzing their environmental impact => this raises question on the way of measuring the environmental effects of the 2 kinds of cups, which, if clarified will help determine which kind of cup will cause more harm, and thus be the worse choice --- CORRECT
(E) whether paper and foam cups, in their most popular sizes, hold the same quantities of liquid => not related to conclusion
