Quote:
Opponents of the free market approach assert that the free market often fails to achieve maximum efficiency—that it sometimes wastes resources. They often cite the example of utility services. If there were free competition among utilities, it would lead to a lot of duplication—different companies putting up telephone and electric poles, waterlines, etc., side by side, which would be a waste. So they argue that it is important for government to restrict competition and thus correct market failures.
The answer to which of the following questions would help evaluate whether the opponents of the free market theory are correct?
(A) Whether it is possible to procure items such as electric and telephone poles used by utility services at low prices
(B) Whether there is some other feasible way of solving the problem of duplication mentioned in the argument
(C) Whether following this strategy is likely to lead to formation of monopolies that can be used to exploit consumers
(D) Whether the free market is likely to have any detrimental effect on the economy of the country
(E) Whether the free market approach has been adopted by any other countries in the world
The right answer to this question is
C. The biggest challenge this question actually poses is in identifying the conclusion of the argument. This alone turns the question from being actually fairly straightforward into a nightmarishly hard one.
The conclusion of the argument here is that "
it is important for government to restrict competition and thus correct market failures". Since this is an 'evaluate' question, we're looking for an option that, if answered one way, supports this conclusion and if answered the other way, hurts the conclusion.
A - The problem that the government solves, according to the argument, is one of duplication. Whether the capital costs of electric/phone poles are high or low, the duplication problem will still exist in some form. Hence, the conclusion is supported by A no matter what.
OUTB -
This is the trap answer! If there is no feasible way, the conclusion obviously holds true. But even if there is another way, it doesn't change the fact that this method would still work/be important.
Analogy: Just because a "better" GMAT score of 770 exists, it doesn't make a score of 720 a bad one. OUTC - If the answer to this question is no, the conclusion holds true. If the answer is yes, however, the conclusion suddenly falls apart. Hence,
this is exactly the piece of info that we need in order to tell us if the conclusion is sound or not, i.e. evaluate the conclusion. Hence, this option is
CORRECT.
D - Whether the free market has a detrimental effect or not is irrelevant to this argument. We are trying to evaluate whether it is important for the government to play a role, not the market itself.
OUTE - This is super irrelevant. Whether countries adopt an approach or not tells us nothing about whether that approach is good/necessary. In addition, this option isn't even looking at the relevant approach discussed in the conclusion.
OUTOne of the key takeaways here is that for any assumption related questions (Find the assumption, Strengthen/Weaken the argument, Evaluate the argument), the first key obstacle you have to overcome is to correctly identify the claim being made in the conclusion.
- Matoo
Thank you.