Poppy: High taxes are bad, so lower them. Effects of high taxes - less money to spend, low demand for products and services, so high unemployment
Lilly: What would happen if taxes are lowered. Provides examples to explain consequences..
Clearly, Poppy saw only one side of the problem (high taxes), whereas Lilly sees the other side of the problem
Lilly objects to Poppy’s argument by
A. claiming that Poppy has exaggerated the adverse effects of high taxes
Incorrect: Lilly doesn't comment on Poppy's evidences, simply says other points must be considered
B. indicating that Poppy has based his argument on insufficient evidence about the effects of taxes on the economy
Correct: Poppy says lower taxes, however, Lilly objects by providing details of what would happen if taxes are lowered.
C. noting that Poppy has failed to adequately define the term “taxes”
Incorrect: Lilly doesn't define the term "taxes"
D. demonstrating that the danger of reducing taxes is far more severe than the threat of maintaining them at current levels
Incorrect: In Lilly's argument, no comparison of severity of the problem with current tax levels with that of low/high tax levels
E. suggesting that the economic benefits of easy credit outweigh the danger of unemployment
Incorrect: Lilly mentions about consequences of low tax on the economy as a whole, no comparison of economic benefits and danger of unemployment