Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 00:12 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 00:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
51,898
 [13]
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,898
 [13]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
monish447
Joined: 10 Mar 2016
Last visit: 21 Feb 2022
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 2.51
Products:
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
honey1
Joined: 25 Sep 2020
Last visit: 12 May 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 52
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,838
Own Kudos:
51,898
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,838
Kudos: 51,898
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
honey1
hey plz help me with this question
why option c can't be the answer as we can also infer it

This is a matter of a very common chain of argument: IF X, then Y. If Y, then Z. Therefore, if X, then Z. Specifically: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then there is an undeniable need for citizens to better understand international affairs. If there’s a need for this better understanding of international affairs, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation. This allows us to infer that the first statement leads to the third: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subjects with an international orientation.

(B) and (C), like many choices before them on this test, confuse necessary and sufficient conditions. The stimulus establishes the ability of new teachers to teach with an international focus as necessary for the country to remain competitive. We can’t infer, as (B) suggests, that it’s sufficient for this. And as for (C), better understanding of international affairs by our citizens is also necessary, but not sufficient, for the country to remain competitive.

Thank you
avatar
honey1
Joined: 25 Sep 2020
Last visit: 12 May 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 52
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
honey1
hey plz help me with this question
why option c can't be the answer as we can also infer it

This is a matter of a very common chain of argument: IF X, then Y. If Y, then Z. Therefore, if X, then Z. Specifically: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then there is an undeniable need for citizens to better understand international affairs. If there’s a need for this better understanding of international affairs, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation. This allows us to infer that the first statement leads to the third: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subjects with an international orientation.

(B) and (C), like many choices before them on this test, confuse necessary and sufficient conditions. The stimulus establishes the ability of new teachers to teach with an international focus as necessary for the country to remain competitive. We can’t infer, as (B) suggests, that it’s sufficient for this. And as for (C), better understanding of international affairs by our citizens is also necessary, but not sufficient, for the country to remain competitive.

Thank you


so can we also eliminate it as the word 'will" is too strong to be inferred.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,663
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
honey1
hey plz help me with this question
why option c can't be the answer as we can also infer it
Hello, honey1. We seem to be crossing paths quite frequently. I must say, unless you are preparing for the LSAT, you should find practicing GMAT™ CR questions more useful for the test you intend to take. To be honest, you could present this question to me without tags and tell me it was official, and I would probably say something like, "Official? Official LSAT, maybe." GMAT™ CR questions simply have a different feel, and, as I have written in other posts, LSAT logical reasoning questions rely more on formal logic. So, rather than go down the LSAT rabbit hole, you might consider studying questions tagged under GMAT™ instead.

Anyway, in the question at hand, choice (C) uses a bit of sleight of hand to replace a conditional statement from the passage with a must-be-true statement. Look at the pertinent part of the passage again, along with choice (C):

Sajjad1994
If the country is to remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness, the need [for better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry] is undeniable.

(C) If there is better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry, then the country will remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness.

See the difference? The passage presents a prerequisite for international competitiveness, while the answer choice boldly states that a country meeting such a prerequisite will automatically remain a leading nation. The two are not the same, and choice (C) is therefore incorrect. Meanwhile, choice (A) completes a syllogism: if A, then B; if B, then C; so, if A, then C. I would recommend revisiting the passage and seeing if you can spot the syllogism. Choice (A) will be easy to understand at that point.

I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have further questions. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Public reports by national commissions, governors’ conferences, and leadership groups have stressed the great need for better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry. If the country is to remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness, the need is undeniable. If there is such a need for the citizenry to have a better understanding of international affairs, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation.

If all of the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true?

(A) If the country is to remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness, then new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation. - CORRECT. Reiterates what is said in the passage.

(B) If new teachers are prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation, then the country will remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness. - WRONG. Reverse situation may not be true.

(C) If there is better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry, then the country will remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness. - WRONG. Like B, this too makes a jump and claims what may not be necessairly true.

(D) If the country is to remain a leading nation in an era of international competitiveness, then there is no need for the citizenry to have a better understanding of international affairs. - WRONG. Absolutely wrong.

(E) Public reports from various groups and commissions have stressed the need for a more international orientation in the education of teachers. - WRONG. They have not said and more so may or may not have said but it is concluded by the author.

Answer A.
User avatar
EnglishAgast
Joined: 29 Dec 2023
Last visit: 28 May 2025
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 193
Posts: 100
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994

honey1
hey plz help me with this question
why option c can't be the answer as we can also infer it
This is a matter of a very common chain of argument: IF X, then Y. If Y, then Z. Therefore, if X, then Z. Specifically: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then there is an undeniable need for citizens to better understand international affairs. If there’s a need for this better understanding of international affairs, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation. This allows us to infer that the first statement leads to the third: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subjects with an international orientation.

(B) and (C), like many choices before them on this test, confuse necessary and sufficient conditions. The stimulus establishes the ability of new teachers to teach with an international focus as necessary for the country to remain competitive. We can’t infer, as (B) suggests, that it’s sufficient for this. And as for (C), better understanding of international affairs by our citizens is also necessary, but not sufficient, for the country to remain competitive.

Thank you
Hello Sajjad1994 , thanks for the explanation. Where can i find/sort similar questions like this? Also is there any approach to evaluate the dependency chain?
avatar
HRX273
Joined: 22 Jan 2025
Last visit: 01 Apr 2026
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 145
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
so it means to be competitive we need too teach international orientation. ?? bit confused I have read your argument but still hard too eliminate c, if you can added on bit more. thank you in advance.
Sajjad1994


This is a matter of a very common chain of argument: IF X, then Y. If Y, then Z. Therefore, if X, then Z. Specifically: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then there is an undeniable need for citizens to better understand international affairs. If there’s a need for this better understanding of international affairs, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation. This allows us to infer that the first statement leads to the third: If the country is to remain internationally competitive, then all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subjects with an international orientation.

(B) and (C), like many choices before them on this test, confuse necessary and sufficient conditions. The stimulus establishes the ability of new teachers to teach with an international focus as necessary for the country to remain competitive. We can’t infer, as (B) suggests, that it’s sufficient for this. And as for (C), better understanding of international affairs by our citizens is also necessary, but not sufficient, for the country to remain competitive.

Thank you
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts