The original Star Wars film (1977), in which Luke Skywalker saved Princess Leia and battled against the evil Empire, was followed by two equally successful sequels: "The Empire Strikes back and Return of the Jedi. Nearly 25 years later, the Star Wars prequels have arrived, and they are even more successful than the original series. The prequels (The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, and the soon-to-be released Episode III) have shattered box office records, filling theaters with audiences of young children, teenagers, and adults alike.
Which of the following
conclusions can properly be drawn from this statement?
To find the conclusion, let's jot down the points:
org film('77) + 2 sequels
25yrs later- sequel > original series (success)
Conclusion: prequel box office hit and all audience(all age group) loved the movie.
The conclusion should give a strong reason as to why all loved the movie irrespective of the age group.
A. The prequels are better than the original and its sequels.
INCORRECT. Pretty attractive wrong answer. But it never states a reason as to why people loved the prequel. It can't always be true that a movie will be a hit and liked by all if the movie is better than the rest. Tons of good movies (prequels, sequels or otherwise) are a flop.
B. The prequels have been marketed more effectively than the original and its sequels.
INCORRECT. The passage mentions nothing about marketing. Out of scope.
C. The Star Wars films have phenomenal special effects.
INCORRECT. This says nothing specifically about prequel or sequel. If all movies have special effects, then why specific movie/s became a hit?
D. Fans of the original films have always wanted more Star Wars stories.
INCORRECT. This right the wish of every fan but unfortunately, nothing is mentioned about it in the passage.
E. The themes and epic struggles of the Star Wars movies appeal to viewers of all generations.
CORRECT. This gives a clear conclusion as to why the viewers of all generations appeal the themes in the films.