Argument Summary:
The passage suggests that viruses, despite their simple structures, can mutate easily. Beneficial viruses can become deadly to humans with just a few structural changes. This suggests that viruses, due to their simplicity and susceptibility to random mutations, can potentially become harmful.
Option Analysis:
(A) Random mutation makes some deadly viruses beneficial to humans.
This is possible because mutations can alter viruses. While the passage highlights the danger of mutations, it doesn't rule out the possibility that a harmful virus could mutate in a way that makes it beneficial. So, this could be true.
(B) Some organisms of greater complexity than viruses are no more likely than viruses to undergo significant alterations through random mutation.
This could be true because the passage suggests that random mutations frequently affect viruses due to their simplicity. It doesn't imply that more complex organisms cannot undergo mutations. So, this could be true.
(C) Some microorganisms that are more complex than viruses are beneficial to humans.
This could be true, as the passage mentions that some complex microorganisms can be deadly, which implies others could be beneficial. This could be true.
(D) Some viruses that fail to kill other viruses that are deadly to humans are nevertheless beneficial to humans.
This could be true because a virus might not directly kill other viruses but could still have beneficial effects in other ways. So, this could be true.
(E) No virus that is deadly to organisms of greater complexity than itself is beneficial to humans.
This is the only option that contradicts the argument. The passage discusses how a virus might kill deadly microorganisms, which could imply that viruses harmful to other organisms could still be beneficial to humans. Thus, this cannot be true based on the given information.Answer:
The correct answer is (E).