To solve the traffic congestion problem of the 60 km long north-south link road, the municipal corporation has decided to build a parallel road for the middle stretch of 50 km of the north-south link road. The administration hopes to recover the money spent on this project by charging a toll of Rs. 50 for the first year after the completion of this new road. They estimate the traffic to become evenly distributed between the two roads only after this initial year.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the conclusion?
A. The north-south link road connects two different parts of the city and will always be more in demand and more congested than will any other existing road.
B. The cost of building the new road will not be covered by the charging the decided toll rates for a year.
C. Most of the traffic on the north-south link road is due to office going people who do not mind paying up for a traffic-free ride to work.
D. The construction of the new road will not be completed for at least three years.
E. The north-south link road already has three parallel roads of 5 km each in different areas along its length.
Identifying the 'Conclusion' --> It is estimated that the traffic will be evenly distributed between the two roads only after a year, and so charging Rs 50 (possibly a hefty toll) is justified.
But, Option C mentions that the office going peope, primarily responsible for congestion, don't mind payimg up for a traffic-free ride. Consequently, these peope will prefer to travel by new road, and so traffic will get evenly distributed within a much shorter duration of time..THUS weakening the conclusion..