A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive trainin

Question

Competition Mode Question

A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive training and pass a road test under winter conditions before they are granted drivers' licenses. During debate on the legislation, a council member argued that the enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs, and that the money would be better spent on other programs. The council member noted that over the past five years, fewer than fifteen percent of motor vehicle collisions in the state occurred when there was snow on the ground.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the council member's argument?

A. The majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road.

B. The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage.

C. State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country.

D. Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow.

E. State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country.

Leadership · Answer

Paraphrasing: Council member against the proposed law. Presents a fact of 'over the .... on the ground' If we can prove that due to snow, there are serious accidents, we can weaken his statement. A. The majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road. - Bingo

, it proves that accidents caused death and injuries when there was snow - weakening the council member's argument. Keep it and check other options. B. The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage. - ok, but where is the snow

. Snow factor is mandatory to strengthen/weaken. Gone

C. State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country. - Yeah, but it does not affect the council member's argument. Gone

D. Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow. - It does not affect the council member's argument. We aren't looking to find out the percentage of people who have training or not. Gone

E. State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country. - ok, was it due to snow

? Snow factor is mandatory to strengthen/weaken. Gone

'A' is the winner

exc4libur · Answer

ARGUMENT
  proposed law req public to get training and pass winter test to receive license;
  fewer than 15% of collisions past 5y occurred when there was snow;
  expenditures required for the law does not justify the public safety needs;

WEAKEN
B. this strengthens - if most accidents don't result in injury, then the proposed law seems unjustified;
C. irrelevant;
D. most have no snow training, but do they really need it?
E. irrelevant;

Ans (A)  most deaths (serious public risk) occurred when there was snow, so this weakens the evidence used by the argument;

PTD1995 · Answer

Option A

A) The majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road.
 Correct

B. The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage.
Does not adress the council member's argument

C. State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country.
Does not adress the council member's argument

D. Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow.
Does not adress the council member's argument

E. State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country.
This depends on the number of population of the town. Not relevant

unraveled · Answer

A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive training and pass a road test under winter conditions before they are granted drivers' licenses. During debate on the legislation, a council member argued that the enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs, and that the money would be better spent on other programs. The council member noted that over the past five years, fewer than fifteen percent of motor vehicle collisions in the state occurred when there was snow on the ground.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the council member's argument?

A. The majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road. - CORRECT. Gives a reason for the requirement of proposed law that concerns safety needs of people.
B. The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage. - WRONG. Irrelevant.
C. State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country. - WRONG. Degree of weakening the council member's argument is relatively less than option A.
D. Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow. - WRONG. Out of scope. Drivers already having the license are not discussed.
E. State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

IMO Answer A.

Archit3110 · Answer

IMO D

Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow.

WEAKENS members argument most

council member argued that the enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs, and that the money would be better spent on other programs

A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive training and pass a road test under winter conditions before they are granted drivers' licenses. During debate on the legislation, 
 council member argued that the enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs, and that the money would be better spent on other programs. The council member noted that over the past five years, fewer than fifteen percent of motor vehicle collisions in the state occurred when there was snow on the ground.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the council member's argument?

A. The majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road.

B. The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage.

C. State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country.

D. Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow.

E. State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country.

Posted from my mobile device

eakabuah · Answer

The right answer is A in my view.

Premise: A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive training and pass a road test under winter conditions before they are granted drivers' licenses.
Counter-premise: The council member noted that over the past five years, fewer than fifteen percent of motor vehicle collisions in the state occurred when there was snow on the ground.
Conclusion: The enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs, and that the money would be better spent on other programs.

From the argument above, the council member states that the enormous expenditures required for the law could not be justified by public safety needs based on the premise that fewer than fifteen percent of motor vehicle collisions in the state occurred when there was snow on the ground.

What about if the fewer accidents that occurred during the snowy conditions actually contributed to the most fatalities from accidents. Then the safety of the State would be threatened by driving during winter conditions, and therefore justify the decision of the State to require a new driver to be tested on driving during winter conditions before he/she is granted a driver's license. Such high fatalities resulting from accidents when there was snow on the ground would greatly weaken the argument made by the council member.

A states that the majority of car accidents in State Q involving death or serious injury in the last two years occurred when there was snow or ice on the road. This is in line with the above, hence A weakens the argument made by the council member.

B: The majority of car accidents in State Q in any given year do not result in any personal injury, only property damage. B strengthens the council member's argument rather than weaken it.

C: State Q, located in the northern portion of the country, experiences snow more often than any other state in the country. This does not weaken nor strengthen the argument made by the council member. The mere fact that the State experiences more snow than any other State in the country is irrelevant. It could be that the level of snow that State Q experiences is quite low in itself even though it is more than the level of snow experienced by any other state in the country.

D: Most drivers in State Q have no formal training in techniques for driving in the snow. Irrelevant. Formal training is not the only way to acquire driving techniques. Maybe the drivers acquired some form of training although informally, and this can lead to safer driving during snowy conditions.

E: State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities in the entire country. This is irrelevant as it neither weaken nor strengthen the argument of the council member. The fact that State Q has the highest number of motor vehicle fatalities does not mean that these fatalities occur when there is snow on the roads.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive trainin

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants receive trainin

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards