George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to whe

Question

George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to when they are very young are more likely to enjoy reading when they grow up than are children who were not read to. But this claim is clearly false. My cousin Emory was regularly read to as a child and as an adult he seldom reads for pleasure, whereas no one read to me and reading is now my favorite form of relaxation.

Ursula: You and Emory prove nothing in this case. Your experience is enough to refute the claim that all avid adult readers were read to as children, but what the educator said about reading to children is not that sort of claim.

Which one of the following describes a flaw in Georges reasoning?

(A) He treats his own experience and the experiences of other members of his own family as though they have more weight as evidence than do the experiences of other people.

(B) He does not distinguish between the quality and the quantity of the books that adults read to Emory when Emory was a child.

(C) He overlooks the well-known fact that not all reading is equally relaxing.

(D) He fails to establish that the claim made by this particular educator accurately reflects the position held by the majority of educators.

(E) He attempts to refute a general claim by reference to nonconforming cases, although the claim is consistent with the occurrence of such cases.

IanStewart · Answer

The educator is just making a statistical claim: people read to as children are more likely to enjoy reading than those not read to. A single counterexample does nothing to disprove that claim, since the claim is only a probabilistic one. Answer E describes that logical error. What George says would only successfully refute a universal claim, that  all  people read to as children enjoy reading as adults, but that's not what the educator says.

TestPrepUnlimited · Answer

Correct answer: (E).

(A): Incorrect. George does not necessarily treat the experiences of his own family as though they have more weight than other people's experiences; George simply attempts to refute a general propensity (toward reading or not reading) with individual anecdotal cases. 
(B): Incorrect. Neither George nor the educator consider the quality of the books. 
(C): Incorrect. Neither George nor the educator consider how relaxing reading is, just whether the fact that George reads (despite not having been read to) negates the educator's conclusion.
(D): Incorrect. George simply attempts to refute the educator's claim; what other educators believe is immaterial. 
(E): Correct. George attempts to refute the general rule (that children read to are  more likely  to enjoy reading) with nonconforming cases (George and his cousin Emory). The claim is consistent with the occurrence of such cases as it only considers the children's  likelihood   of enjoying reading.

unraveled · Answer

George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to when they are very young are more likely to enjoy reading when they grow up than are children who were not read to. But this claim is clearly false. My cousin Emory was regularly read to as a child and as an adult he seldom reads for pleasure, whereas no one read to me and reading is now my favorite form of relaxation.

Ursula: You and Emory prove nothing in this case. Your experience is enough to refute the claim that all avid adult readers were read to as children, but what the educator said about reading to children is not that sort of claim.

Which one of the following describes a flaw in Georges reasoning?

(A) He treats his own experience and the experiences of other members of his own family as though they have  more weight as evidence than do the experiences of other people . - WRONG. More weightage aspect actually ruins this otherwise good candidate.

(B) He does not distinguish between the  quality and the quantity of the books  that adults read to Emory when Emory was a child. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(C) He overlooks the well-known fact that  not all reading is equally relaxing . - WRONG. Diverts from the core of the issue.

(D) He fails to establish that the claim made by this particular educator  accurately reflects the position held by the majority of educators . - WRONG. Again goes in direction that has no impact on the educators claim.

(E) He attempts to refute a general claim  by reference to nonconforming cases , although the claim is consistent with the occurrence of such cases. - CORRECT. Exceptions are given to defend his refutation of Educator's claim.

Answer E.

PSKhore · Answer

The flaw in George's reasoning is that he attempts to refute a general claim (reading to children increases the likelihood of enjoying reading as adults) by citing specific counterexamples (his and Emory's experiences), even though the claim allows for exceptions. The educator's claim doesn't state that all children read to will enjoy reading, just that it's more likely.

Explanation:

General vs. Specific:

George takes the educator's general statement ("more likely") and treats it as a universal claim ("always the case"). He uses his own and his cousin's experiences, which might be exceptions to the general trend, to disprove the overall point.

"More Likely" vs. "Always":

The educator's statement is probabilistic. It implies that reading to children increases their chances of enjoying reading, but does not guarantee it. Several resources say it's a positive influence but not a deterministic one. 
Why other options are incorrect

(A):While it might seem like (A) is a good answer, the core issue is the overgeneralization, not that he gives more weight to his family's experience than others. He's using only his family's experiences to refute a general claim.

(B):The quality and quantity of books are not relevant to the core argument. The argument is about reading to children, not the type of reading material.

(C):Whether or not all reading is equally relaxing is irrelevant to the claim being evaluated. The claim is about enjoying reading in general.

(D):The focus is on George's own reasoning, not the prevalence of the educator's claim among educators.

Source: AI Overview

George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to whe

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to whe

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards