Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:12 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,072
 [9]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [9]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 1,111
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to when they are very young are more likely to enjoy reading when they grow up than are children who were not read to. But this claim is clearly false. My cousin Emory was regularly read to as a child and as an adult he seldom reads for pleasure, whereas no one read to me and reading is now my favorite form of relaxation.

Ursula: You and Emory prove nothing in this case. Your experience is enough to refute the claim that all avid adult readers were read to as children, but what the educator said about reading to children is not that sort of claim.

Which one of the following describes a flaw in Georges reasoning?


(A) He treats his own experience and the experiences of other members of his own family as though they have more weight as evidence than do the experiences of other people. - WRONG. More weightage aspect actually ruins this otherwise good candidate.

(B) He does not distinguish between the quality and the quantity of the books that adults read to Emory when Emory was a child. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(C) He overlooks the well-known fact that not all reading is equally relaxing. - WRONG. Diverts from the core of the issue.

(D) He fails to establish that the claim made by this particular educator accurately reflects the position held by the majority of educators. - WRONG. Again goes in direction that has no impact on the educators claim.

(E) He attempts to refute a general claim by reference to nonconforming cases, although the claim is consistent with the occurrence of such cases. - CORRECT. Exceptions are given to defend his refutation of Educator's claim.

Answer E.
User avatar
PSKhore
Joined: 28 Apr 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 172
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Products:
Posts: 172
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The flaw in George's reasoning is that he attempts to refute a general claim (reading to children increases the likelihood of enjoying reading as adults) by citing specific counterexamples (his and Emory's experiences), even though the claim allows for exceptions. The educator's claim doesn't state that all children read to will enjoy reading, just that it's more likely.

Explanation:

General vs. Specific:

George takes the educator's general statement ("more likely") and treats it as a universal claim ("always the case"). He uses his own and his cousin's experiences, which might be exceptions to the general trend, to disprove the overall point.

"More Likely" vs. "Always":

The educator's statement is probabilistic. It implies that reading to children increases their chances of enjoying reading, but does not guarantee it. Several resources say it's a positive influence but not a deterministic one.
Why other options are incorrect

(A):While it might seem like (A) is a good answer, the core issue is the overgeneralization, not that he gives more weight to his family's experience than others. He's using only his family's experiences to refute a general claim.

(B):The quality and quantity of books are not relevant to the core argument. The argument is about reading to children, not the type of reading material.

(C):Whether or not all reading is equally relaxing is irrelevant to the claim being evaluated. The claim is about enjoying reading in general.

(D):The focus is on George's own reasoning, not the prevalence of the educator's claim among educators.

Source: AI Overview
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts