People who are good at playing football are invariably skilled with their feet. Jane is a very competent ballet dancer. Therefore, Jane would make a good football player.
The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?
First of all if you read argument properly you would know, there is a comparision of skills. Author says if one have Skill A that means he/she also can be powerful in Skill B. And then Author said that means if any one have Skill B then he/she is powerful in Skill A.
From this reasoning we can easily eliminate options B,D & E.
Now from A & C only A comapres skill hence my answer is A.
a) All race car drivers have good reflexes. Chris is a champion table tennis player. Therefore, Chris would make a good racecar driver. - correct
b) People who write for a living invariably enjoy reading. Julie has been a published novelist for many years. Therefore, Julie enjoys reading. - irrelevant
c) People with long legs make good runners. Everyone in Daryl's family has long legs. Therefore, Daryl would make a good runner. -not comparing skill.
d) The role of Santa Claus in a shopping mall is often played by an experienced actor. Erwin has played Santa Claus in shopping malls for years. Therefore, Erwin must be an experienced actor.-Actor vs actor Wrong
e) Any good skier can learn to ice-skate eventually. Erica is a world-class skier. Therefore, Ericacould learn to ice-skate in a day or two.- learn is not direct comparison with argument hence void.
Correct Answer : A
Posted from my mobile device