honey1
hey plz help me with this question
if in option a we replace word match we compatible than option a can be our answer and how can option d be the answer as
if person blood is o type then he do not need to know the blood type of recipient so how can this be possible if person blood type is not o then need to know the blood type of recipient
if o--->then no need to know
if not o---->then need to know
Hello,
honey1. Choice (A) would still be on questionable ground if we replaced the word in question:
Quote:
(A) The special usefulness of type 0 blood lies in the fact that it
is compatible with the blood type of most people.
The problem lies in the use of
most, implying that not all people could be served type O blood. But that goes directly against the second line of the passage:
type O blood can be used for everyone. In short,
most is not to be confused with
all.
Choice (D) is correct because of the third line of the passage:
Quote:
Type 0 blood is unique in that it is compatible with blood of all types: any recipient, regardless of blood type, can be given it.
If type O blood is
unique in its universal compatibility, then other blood types must
not be universally compatible. This simple understanding leads straight to (D):
Quote:
(D) Any decision to give blood of any type other than 0 needs to be based on knowledge of the recipient's blood type.
There is no way to refute this statement, even without background knowledge of the other different basic blood types (A, B, or AB). Although in real life, type AB is known as the universal recipient, we can still appreciate how a type A blood could not be given to a person with type B blood, or vice-versa, and the person donating type AB blood had better have a matching recipient, since any of types A, B, or O in a recipient would be incompatible. (Remember, type O is the universal donor blood type, not the universal recipient.)
I hope that helps. If you have further questions, feel free to ask.
- Andrew