Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 16:55 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 16:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [10]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GDT
Joined: 02 Jan 2020
Last visit: 18 Sep 2020
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
118
 [1]
Given Kudos: 477
Posts: 233
Kudos: 118
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
HarshaGM
Joined: 02 Apr 2020
Last visit: 09 Oct 2023
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
91
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 22
Kudos: 91
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ani23x
Joined: 21 Mar 2020
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Applying the negation test, I think that E is better than A. Even if she does not live in the town (but is only visiting), she can still buy the pig and keep it with her for the duration of her stay. In this context as well, the officials can deny her keeping the pig as a pet. But if selling pet pigs is not even legal in the first place, then the chain of events cannot happen at all (it could, but it would lead to a lot of other problems with regard to legality which are beyond the scope of this passage).

Anyone? Thanks in advance.
User avatar
David nguyen
Joined: 15 May 2017
Last visit: 18 Aug 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Status:Discipline & Consistency always beats talent
Location: United States (CA)
GPA: 3.59
WE:Sales (Retail: E-commerce)
Posts: 132
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ani23x
Applying the negation test, I think that E is better than A. Even if she does not live in the town (but is only visiting), she can still buy the pig and keep it with her for the duration of her stay. In this context as well, the officials can deny her keeping the pig as a pet. But if selling pet pigs is not even legal in the first place, then the chain of events cannot happen at all (it could, but it would lead to a lot of other problems with regard to legality which are beyond the scope of this passage).

Anyone? Thanks in advance.

Let me ask you this: If guns are outlawed, is it possible that guns will still being sold and bought in the market?

TIP: One thing that you should always keep in mind is that GMAT authors believe all premises are true. Never question the premises, but do question the assumptions that link premises to conclusion. When the author wrote the piece, he or she presented you a context, which does not necessarily have to be true in a real life — most of the contexts are hypothetical contexts, not real events . Take the premises as their face value!

Back to the argument: Assuming (E) is true. Do the officials have the right to seize the pig from Amy? How would the official be able to tell whether she is going to keep the pig as pet or for dinner? Perhaps she lied to the official to get away...

I think you assume the situation this way, correct me if I am wrong: After purchasing, she got stopped by the official immediately at the counter or at the point of purchase. However, It is possible that after she had purchased and drove 2 miles, she was stopped by an official because he saw the pig in her car.

The point is, there are too many possibilities in (E) which does not guarantee that the conclusion could NOT be drawn. The correct answer choice must always be true in order for one to draw the conclusion. MAYBE, COULD BE TRUE, or PROBABLE answer choices are all wrong.

Does that make any sense to you?
avatar
ani23x
Joined: 21 Mar 2020
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
David nguyen
ani23x
Applying the negation test, I think that E is better than A. Even if she does not live in the town (but is only visiting), she can still buy the pig and keep it with her for the duration of her stay. In this context as well, the officials can deny her keeping the pig as a pet. But if selling pet pigs is not even legal in the first place, then the chain of events cannot happen at all (it could, but it would lead to a lot of other problems with regard to legality which are beyond the scope of this passage).

Anyone? Thanks in advance.

Let me ask you this: If guns are outlawed, is it possible that guns will still being sold and bought in the market?

TIP: One thing that you should always keep in mind is that GMAT authors believe all premises are true. Never question the premises, but do question the assumptions that link premises to conclusion. When the author wrote the piece, he or she presented you a context, which does not necessarily have to be true in a real life — most of the contexts are hypothetical contexts, not real events . Take the premises as their face value!

Back to the argument: Assuming (E) is true. Do the officials have the right to seize the pig from Amy? How would the official be able to tell whether she is going to keep the pig as pet or for dinner? Perhaps she lied to the official to get away...

I think you assume the situation this way, correct me if I am wrong: After purchasing, she got stopped by the official immediately at the counter or at the point of purchase. However, It is possible that after she had purchased and drove 2 miles, she was stopped by an official because he saw the pig in her car.

The point is, there are too many possibilities in (E) which does not guarantee that the conclusion could NOT be drawn. The correct answer choice must always be true in order for one to draw the conclusion. MAYBE, COULD BE TRUE, or PROBABLE answer choices are all wrong.

Does that make any sense to you?

Ah yeah, I get it now. Thanks man. I did get little ahead of myself and assumed all minds of things.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts