Grasses and woody plants are planted on dirt embankments to keep the embankments from eroding. The embankments are mowed to keep the grasses from growing too tall; as a result, clippings pile up. These piles of clippings smother the woody plants, causing their roots, which serve to keep the embankments from eroding, to rot; they also attract rodents that burrow into the dirt and damage the woody plant’s roots. Therefore, bringing in predators to eradicate the rodents will prevent erosion of the embankments.
Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in the argument?
(A) Two events that merely co-occur are treated as if
one caused the other. - WRONG. Altogether wrong.
(B) A
highly general proposal is based only on an
unrepresentative set of facts. - WRONG. Both highlighted text is wrong.
(C) The conclusion is
no more than a restatement of one of the pieces of evidence provided to support it. - WRONG. It is not a reinstatement but a general flow with a possible solution.
(D) One possible solution to a problem is
claimed to be the
only possible solution to that problem. - WRONG. 2nd best for me. Spent a lot of time on this one. Neither it claimed in such a manner nor it is said that the solution is the only one.
(E) An action that would eliminate one cause of a problem is treated
as if it would solve the entire problem. - CORRECT. A possible solution is amplified to solve the entire problem.
Answer E.