Akela
The sun emits two types of ultraviolet radiation that damage skin: UV-A, which causes premature wrinkles, and UV-B, which causes sunburn. Until about ten years ago, sunscreens protected against UV-B radiation but not against UV-A radiation.
Which one of the following is best supported by the information above?
(A) Since about ten years ago, the percentage of people who wear sunscreen every time they spend time in the sun has increased.
(B) Most people whose skin is prematurely wrinkled have spent a large amount of time in the sun without wearing sunscreen.
(C) The specific cause of premature skin wrinkling was not known until about ten years ago.
(D) People who wear sunscreen now are less likely to become sunburned than were people who spent the same amount of time in the sun wearing sunscreen ten years ago.
(E) Until about ten years ago, people who wore sunscreen were no less likely to have premature wrinkles than were people who spent the same amount of time in the sun without wearing sunscreen.
The question requires us to find a conclusion or make a logical inference from the given statements.
The passage gives us the information that the sun emits two types of ultraviolet radiation that damages the skin. UV-A causes premature wrinkles and UV-B causes sunburn. Until about ten years ago, sunscreens protected skin against UV-B radiation but not against UV-A radiation.
The passage does not discuss people who wear sunscreen. So, we cannot draw any conclusion about the percentage of people who wear sunscreen every time they go out into the sun.
So, Option A can be eliminated.Option B states that most people whose skin is prematurely wrinkled have spent time in the sun without wearing sunscreen. But the passage states that sunscreen didn’t protect against UV-A radiation, which causes premature wrinkles. The passage does not give us any information about people choosing not to use sunscreen.
So, Option B can also be eliminated.Option C goes on a tangent. The passage gives us information about the two types of ultraviolet radiation and their effects. The passage does mention that premature wrinkles are caused by UV-A but this is only one part of the information that has been provided. By drawing a conclusion that the specific cause of premature wrinkles was not known until ten years back, the focus of the passage shifts and the conclusion would not be valid as we don’t have enough information to support this conclusion.
So, Option C can also be eliminated.The passage states that until about ten years ago, sunscreen provided protection against UV-B radiation, which causes sunburn but not against UV-A radiation, which causes premature wrinkles. So, sunscreen has provided protection against sunburn for some time now. Option D states that people who wear sunscreen are less likely now to be sunburned than people who wore sunscreen were likely to be sunburned ten years ago. But we already know that sunscreen did protect against sunburn ten years ago. The passage does not give us any information about whether the protection that sunscreen provides against sunburn has changed.
So, Option D can also be eliminated.
The last sentence of the passage states that until about ten years ago, sunscreen protected against UV-B radiation but not against UV-A radiation. The passage also tells us what the effects of the two types of radiation are. Since sunscreen did not provide protection against premature wrinkles until ten years back, it wouldn’t make a difference if people did wear sunscreen or not. This is what Option E states.
Therefore, E is the most appropriate option.Jayanthi Kumar.