A mechanized factory with over 3000 separate conveyor belts wants to

Question

A mechanized factory with over 3000 separate conveyor belts wants to minimize the cost associated with maintenance, repair, and replacement of these belts. The conveyer belts currently are composed vulcanized rubber around a cotton web base, but the factory owners are investigating new plastic polymer design. For any given size belt, the costs for belts of the two compositions are comparable. Compared to the current rubber/cotton belts, the plastic polymer belts are lighter and easier to move, so operating the conveyor belts made of plastic polymer would consume less electric energy. A change from rubber/cotton belts to plastic polymer belts would require minor modification to some of the drive cylinders of the conveyor belts, but the costs of these changes are negligible.

Which of the following would it be most useful to know in determining whether switching to the plastic polymer conveyor belts would be likely to help minimize the factory's cost related to its conveyor belt system?

(A) Whether a typical plastic polymer conveyor belt has an approximate serviceable life as least as long as the typical rubber/cotton belt of the same size and shape.

(B) Whether, in remodeling, the factory plans to increase the total number of conveyor belts in its mechanized system.

(C) Whether the crew that currently maintains the conveyor belts knows how to perform the modification to the drive cylinders necessary to switch to plastic polymer belts.

(D) Whether other mechanized factories with comparable number of conveyor belts in their systems have switched from rubber/cotton to plastic polymer conveyor belts.

(E) Whether the industrial supplier from which the factory traditionally has ordered its rubber/cotton conveyor belts also sells plastic polymer conveyor belts.

haithamnimer · Answer

Factory wants to switch from current belts to a new type of belts composite from polymar. WHY? it needs to reduce the cost associated with repair these belts! 
We need to evaluate the argument based on if switching to the new belts will reduce the cost for the factory!

Let us check answer choices, one per one!

(A) Whether a typical plastic polymer conveyor belt has an approximate serviceable life as least as long as the typical rubber/cotton belt of the same size and shape. --  Here is the right answer, as it is connected with the cost directly. For instance, if the new belts have a lower shelf "serviceable" life, then changing and repair time will increase, and the cost will increase.

(B) Whether, in remodeling, the factory plans to increase the total number of conveyor belts in its mechanized system. --  So, is this will affect the cost associated with the factory plan? No tie to argument!

(C) Whether the crew that currently maintains the conveyor belts knows how to perform the modification to the drive cylinders necessary to switch to plastic polymer belts.  A tempting answer, but it is wrong!
If we answer this question with YES, then the factory needs to check with other experts to change the belts, but it did not connect to the cost of switching the belts.

(D) Whether other mechanized factories with comparable number of conveyor belts in their systems have switched from rubber/cotton to plastic polymer conveyor belts. --  No tie to the argument.

(E) Whether the industrial supplier from which the factory traditionally has ordered its rubber/cotton conveyor belts also sells plastic polymer conveyor belts.  So??

winterschool · Answer

A mechanized factory with over 3000 separate conveyor belts wants to minimize the cost associated with maintenance, repair, and replacement of these belts. The conveyer belts currently are composed vulcanized rubber around a cotton web base, but the factory owners are investigating new plastic polymer design. For any given size belt, the costs for belts of the two compositions are comparable. Compared to the current rubber/cotton belts, the plastic polymer belts are lighter and easier to move, so operating the conveyor belts made of plastic polymer would consume less electric energy. A change from rubber/cotton belts to plastic polymer belts would require minor modification to some of the drive cylinders of the conveyor belts, but the costs of these changes are negligible.

Which of the following would it be most useful to know in determining whether switching to the plastic polymer conveyor belts would be likely to help minimize the factory's cost related to its conveyor belt system?

(A)  Whether a typical plastic polymer conveyor belt has an approximate serviceable life as least as long as the typical rubber/cotton belt of the same size and shape.   Correct

if polymer conveyor belts lifetime less than rubber/cotton belts, than cost will increase

(B) Whether, in remodeling, the factory plans to increase the total number of conveyor belts in its mechanized system.  Incorrect

company can install more polymer conveyor belts that is not a fact

(C) Whether the crew that currently maintains the conveyor belts knows how to perform the modification to the drive cylinders necessary to switch to plastic polymer belts.  Incorrect

already know modification cost is negligible

(D) Whether other mechanized factories with comparable number of conveyor belts in their systems have switched from rubber/cotton to plastic polymer conveyor belts.  Incorrect

dont know about cost from this choice
 
(E) Whether the industrial supplier from which the factory traditionally has ordered its rubber/cotton conveyor belts also sells plastic polymer conveyor belts.  Irrelevant

who manufacture polymer conveyor belts is not necessary

Bunuel · Answer

Magoosh Official Explanation

It would seem that in many ways, the costs associated with the two belt compositions are comparable, and the plastic polymer belts will help with energy savings in the long term. The question remains: are there any hidden long term costs associated with moving to the plastic polymer belts?

Choice (A) is the credited response. If the plastic polymer belts break down more, or simply don't last as long as the traditional belts, then replacing them will incur additional costs that would offset the savings from reduced energy consumption.

(B) is irrelevant: if the company plans to increase the number of belts, then that will have associated costs with either belt system. It doesn't affect the choice of belt.

(C) is not crucial: if they current crew does not know how to modify the system, perhaps the factory will have to hire specialist to come in on a one-time basis to switch over all the drive cylinders, but that's an isolated expense, like the installation costs, which would be offset by long term savings.

(D) would provide weak support at best: other factories might have made this switch for any number of reasons, so the fact that other factors have made this switch would not necessarily tell us anything about whether this particular factory will save money by doing so.

(E) is irrelevant: if the old merchant doesn't sell the old belts, they'll find a new merchant. Big deal. As long as the prices are comparable (which the prompt specifies), this indicates no big change in long term expenses.

A mechanized factory with over 3000 separate conveyor belts wants to

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

A mechanized factory with over 3000 separate conveyor belts wants to

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards