Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 21:08 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 21:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,691
 [23]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
810,691
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,691
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
GAngstA
Joined: 01 Feb 2021
Last visit: 05 Jul 2022
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 48
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 771
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Was just in the process of mapping the facts when the official explanation was posted lol. What luck....

This is an LSAT Inference question all the way. Such heavy use of conditional logic generally does not appear on the GMAT. Nevertheless, it is good practice.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Ashishsingh5305
Joined: 03 Mar 2024
Last visit: 18 Dec 2025
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I want detailed answer for this question. It would be good if someone can provide this
User avatar
choochoo17
Joined: 05 Dec 2024
Last visit: 15 Dec 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT.

This means Yale is subset of studies hard for LSAT

No one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.

This means studies hard for LSAT is a subset of not tri-state uni grad

Think in terms of venn diagrams. Yale is enclosed by studies hard for LSAT, which in turn is enclosed by not tri-state uni grad. So tri-state uni grad is outside of all the circles. Now the answer becomes trivial:


No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT. No one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.

Which one of the following conclusions necessarily follows from the above statements?


(A) No graduate of Tri-State University was admitted to Yale Law School. -> Yes, tri-state uni grad has no overlap with Yale

(B) Some graduates of Tri-State University were admitted to Yale Law School. -> No, tri-state uni grad has no overlap with Yale

(C) All graduates of Tri-State University studied hard for the LSAT. -> No, tri-state uni grad has no overlap with studies hard for LSAT

(D) Only graduates of Tri-State University did well on the LSAT. -> No, nothing was said about doing well on LSAT, just that some students worked hard

(E) Only college graduates did well on the LSAT. -> No, nothing was said about doing well on LSAT, just that some students worked hard
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,389
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT. No one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.

Which one of the following conclusions necessarily follows from the above statements?


(A) No graduate of Tri-State University was admitted to Yale Law School.

(B) Some graduates of Tri-State University were admitted to Yale Law School.

(C) All graduates of Tri-State University studied hard for the LSAT.

(D) Only graduates of Tri-State University did well on the LSAT.

(E) Only college graduates did well on the LSAT.




No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT.

means "Studying hard for LSAT" is necessary for "admit to Yale Law"

No one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.

means "Not a Grad from TSU is necessary for "Studying hard for LSAT"

This means that not being from TSU is necessary to study hard. So a TSU grad will not study hard and hence will not get into Yale Law.
That is why option (A) is correct.

Answer (A)


Conditionals venn diagram for CR:
https://youtu.be/RfRb_2IaBJw

How to Handle the Unless Construct:
https://youtu.be/yQYkL1DSslA
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts