No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT. This means
Yale is subset of
studies hard for LSATNo one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.This means
studies hard for LSAT is a subset of
not tri-state uni gradThink in terms of venn diagrams.
Yale is enclosed by
studies hard for LSAT, which in turn is enclosed by
not tri-state uni grad. So tri-state uni grad is outside of all the circles. Now the answer becomes trivial:
No one will be admitted to Yale Law School unless he or she studies hard for the LSAT. No one studied hard for the LSAT unless he or she was not a graduate from Tri-State University.
Which one of the following conclusions necessarily follows from the above statements?
(A) No graduate of Tri-State University was admitted to Yale Law School. -> Yes,
tri-state uni grad has no overlap with
Yale(B) Some graduates of Tri-State University were admitted to Yale Law School. -> No,
tri-state uni grad has no overlap with
Yale(C) All graduates of Tri-State University studied hard for the LSAT. -> No,
tri-state uni grad has no overlap with
studies hard for LSAT(D) Only graduates of Tri-State University did well on the LSAT. -> No, nothing was said about doing well on LSAT, just that some students worked hard
(E) Only college graduates did well on the LSAT. -> No, nothing was said about doing well on LSAT, just that some students worked hard