The shoe company Steps wants to collaborate with the fashion brand Suave. However,
the latter wants to promote its own line of shoes. Therefore, although a collaboration could be very profitable,
Suave is not likely to accept Steps's proposal.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
In the above argument ,We have an easy conclusion indicator 'Therefore'.
What's the conclusion? That Sauve would most likely not colloborate with Steps.And why is that? Sauve wants to promote its own line of shoes.Second bold face is the conclusion , 1st is the premise/basis/evidence for that conclusion.
Eliminate A,B,C.Only D,E remain.
(A) The first is the argument's conclusion, and the second is a piece of evidence supporting this conclusion.
(B) The first is a conclusion made by Suave, and the second is the entire argument's conclusion.
(C) The first is a conclusion made by Steps, and the second is the entire argument's conclusion.
(D) The first is a piece of evidence, and the second is a conclusion that is based on this evidence. -Correct Answer
(E) The first is a piece of evidence, and the second is a conclusion that seems to contradict this evidence.
A Contender Choice, but niether the conclusion nor evidence contradict each other.
Posted from my mobile device