Option D is the correct answer.This is an inference type question.
Frobnia's economy relies on two major industries. The oil fields in south Frobnia allow the country to export petroleum and the natural landmarks in the north attract hundreds of thousands of tourists each year. Tourism employs more than one-third of working Frobnians, and the oil fields employ less than half as many. However, about half of the population of Frobnia lives in the south.
The information given, if accurate, most strongly supports which of the following?
(A) To remain fully staffed, tourism-related companies in Frobnia must recruit in the south. -
its not stated anywhere in the passage that tourism companies are not fully staffed and besides only 1/3rd of the North's population is employed in tourism (B) Most of the people in Frobnia who are not employed live in the south. -
The passage only states a certain proportion of Southerners are employed in one of the two major industries we cant infer that the rest of the population is unemployed(C) Many employed Frobnians in the south work for petroleum-related companies apart from the oil fields, such as refineries.
again this cannot be inferred we don't know what proportion of people employed in the south in fields other than the oil fields (D) A higher proportion of Frobnians working in the north work in one of Frobniaís two major industries than the proportion of Frobnians in the south who do.
We know that about half of the population lives in the South hence the other lives in the north. We also get to know from the passage about one third of working Frobnians and less than half of that is employed in the other major industry(oil fields) in the south (E) Frobniaís oil fields are not a major tourist attraction, but a small number of visitors include the oil fields as part of their travel.-
This can not be infered from the passage