Debater: As a pedagogical practice, lecturing embodies hierarchy, since the lecturer is superior to the student in mastery of the subject. But people learn best from peer interaction. Thus, hierarchy in lecturing is a great weakness.
Respondent: By definition, all teaching and learning are hierarchical, for all teaching and learning must proceed from simple to complex. In teaching mathematics, for example, arithmetic must precede calculus. This, the hierarchy in lecturing is a strength.
MEANINGDebater tells that peer learning is better than lecturing.
So, hierarchy in lecturing is a weakness.
Higher level = lecturer
Lower level = student
WHYDebater believes there is a hierarchy between lecturer and student.
Hierarchy is based on the mastery of the subject.
Respondent tells that teaching and learning is hierarchical in nature.
WHYRespondent tells that learning should always proceed from simple to complex. So, hierarchy is a strength instead of a weakness.
Mathematics is cited as an example.
What is the hierarchy here?Higher level = complex studies
Lower level = simple studies
Hierarchy is based on the complexities of the subject being taught, precisely the concepts within the subject.
Thus, we can clearly see hierarchy in each case is different.
It's like comparing apples to oranges.Thus, the flaw is in the interpretation of the concept of hierarchy.
Option (D) clearly encapsulates this flaw.