Correct option EPremise: Motor oil serves to lubricate engines and thus retard engine wear.
Study Information: A study was conducted
- to assess the effectiveness of various brands of motor oil
- by using them in taxicabs over a 6,000-mile test period.
- All the oils did equally well in retarding wear on pistons and cylinders, the relevant parts of the engine.
Conclusion: cheaper brands of oil are the best buys.
Assumption: Cost is considered more important than quality and performance of Oil
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
(A) Cheaper brands of motor oil are often used by
knowledgeable automobile mechanics for their own cars.
Wrong: Mechanic details – irrelevant, Cheaper brand used by mechanic – Strengthen the conclusion.
(B)
Tests other than of the ability to reduce engine wear also
can reliably gauge the quality of motor oil.
Wrong: Test other than, means more test, demean the passage purpose
(C) The lubricating properties of all motor oils
deteriorate over time, and
the rate of deterioration is
accelerated by heat.
Wrong: heat factor – irrelevant, it gives property of oli, that more vehicle run, will generate heat and quality of oil will be worsened.
(D) The engines of
some individual cars that
have had their oil changed every 3,000 miles, using only a
certain brand of oil,
have lasted an extraordinarily long time.
Wrong: No information about, which kind of quality, cost of oil used to give this performance, general statement.
(E) Ability
to retard engine wear is
not the only property of motor oil important
to the running of an engine.
Correct: this raise question on conclusion and assumption, that apart from retarding engine wear, oil has other purpose, which can improve engine life with good quality oil.