Principle: It is healthy for children to engage in an activity that pr

Question

Principle: It is healthy for children to engage in an activity that promotes their intellectual development only if engaging in that activity does not detract from their social development.

Application: Although Megan’s frequent reading stimulates her intellectually, it reduces the amount of time she spends interacting with other people. Therefore, it is not healthy for her to read as much as she does.

The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) It misinterprets the principle as a universal claim intended to hold in all cases without exception, rather than as a mere generalization.

(B) It overlooks the possibility that the benefits of a given activity may sometimes be important enough to outweigh the adverse health effects.

(C) It misinterprets the principle to be, at least in part, a claim about what is unhealthy, rather than solely a claim about what is healthy.

(D) It takes for granted that any decrease in the amount of time a child spends interacting with others detracts from that child’s social development.

(E) It takes a necessary condition for an activity’s being healthy as a sufficient condition for its being so.

Bunuel · Accepted Answer

EXPLANATION FROM Fox LSAT

The word “only” indicates a necessary condition, so the principle essentially says, “If it is healthy to engage in an activity that promotes their intellectual development, then it is necessary that that activity does not detract from their social development.” In other words: healthy to engage intellectually —> detracts socially. The contrapositive would be: detracts socially —> healthy to engage intellectually.

We are asked to criticize the application of this principle. The application in this question seems okay, but if I were to criticize it I would note that it assumes that “reduces the amount of time interacting” is the same thing as “detracts socially.” Is this necessarily true? I’m not so sure. I have two different predictions here. 1) Perhaps Megan would benefit socially from spending less time interacting with her friends. Maybe less is more; that’s possible, unless the premises say it’s impossible. 2) Perhaps reading books will make Megan a more stimulating social companion, so even though she has less time to spend with her friends she will have a greater overall social development in the time she does spend with them. Who knows. Either of these, or something similar, would be a great answer.

A) Nah. This isn’t what we’re looking for. And the principle wasn’t “a mere generalization.” It was a rule, meant to hold in all cases. Were there exceptions? Did it say “most of the time”? I don’t think so. This can’t be it.

B) This can’t be the answer, because the principle is only about what’s healthy and what’s not healthy. Answer B says, “Sometimes other **** is more important than health,” which would only render the principle itself irrelevant. That’s not criticizing the application, that’s overriding the principle. No way.

C) I honestly do not know what this would possibly mean in application. Let’s not dwell on it until we read D and E. I’m 99 percent certain that one of the other answers will convince me that it is correct, and therefore we will never have to waste time with this answer choice.

D) Mhmm. Yep. This is pretty much exactly our first prediction, above. Maybe Megan’s social life will be just fine if she spends a little less time with her friends. Maybe she’ll even benefit! Looks good.

E) We know what the necessary-sufficient error looks like. It looks like, “Since having blood in your body is necessary for life, as long as you have blood in your body you are alive.” That’s a commonly-tested flaw, but it wasn’t the flaw that the application made in this case.

Our answer is D.

PyjamaScientist · Answer

(D)  in my opinion.

Application takes for granted that spending less time with people = lack of social development. What if whatsoever time she spends with the people is enough for her social development? Option D hits this flaw precisely and thus the correct choice in my opinion.

winterschool · Answer

Principle: It is healthy for children to engage in an activity that promotes their intellectual development only if engaging in that activity does not detract from their social development.

Application: Although Megan’s frequent reading stimulates her intellectually, it reduces the amount of time she spends interacting with other people. Therefore, it is not healthy for her to read as much as she does.

The application of the principle is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) It misinterprets the principle as a universal claim intended to hold in all cases without exception, rather than as a mere generalization.  Incorrect

not true

(B) It overlooks the possibility that the benefits of a given activity may sometimes be important enough to outweigh the adverse health effects.  Incorrect

it is not present in the Application

(C) It misinterprets the principle to be, at least in part, a claim about what is unhealthy, rather than solely a claim about what is healthy.  Incorrect

Application is not misinterprets

(D)  It takes for granted that any decrease in the amount of time a child spends interacting with others detracts from that child’s social development.   Correct

application assume that reducing time spent detract from social development

(E) It takes a necessary condition for an activity’s being healthy as a sufficient condition for its being so.  Incorrect

not true

sivatx2 · Answer

healthy --> detracting from social development (otherwise, intellectual dev. is impacted=> not healthy)

Megan reads books --> increased intel. dev --> decreased social interaction => not healthy
This application example clearly state that the principle is flawed, as there is situation that despite decreased social interaction Megan is still unhealthy.

(A) It misinterprets the principle as a universal claim intended to hold in all cases without exception, rather than as a mere generalization. 
 There is no difference between universal claim and generalization (both are same). Eliminate

(B) It overlooks the possibility that the benefits of a given activity may sometimes be important enough to outweigh the adverse health effects. 
 Benefits vs adverse health effects are not part of the argument. Eliminate

(C) It misinterprets the principle to be, at least in part, a claim about what is unhealthy, rather than solely a claim about what is healthy. 
 There is nothing wrong in claiming what is unhealthy. There is no need for unhealthy vs healthy. Eliminate

(D) It takes for granted that any decrease in the amount of time a child spends interacting with others detracts from that child’s social development. 
 This is inline with the flaw that we analyzed earlier. Keep

(E) It takes a necessary condition for an activity’s being healthy as a sufficient condition for its being so. 
 It did not say if one doesn't detract from one's social development => it is a healthy intellectual activity. So this is incorrect. Eliminate

So D is the best answer choice

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Principle: It is healthy for children to engage in an activity that pr

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Principle: It is healthy for children to engage in an activity that pr

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards