The Conclusion: The
undue focus on this painting, along with the popularity of a few other pieces,
prevents most people not only
from seeing the painting for what it really is, but also
from understanding the true scope of 15th and 16th century European painting.
The conclusion states that the undue focus prevents most people from seeing the flaws of the Mona Lisa painting and also prevents them from understanding the true scope of 15th and 16th century paintings.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the argument's conclusion?
A.
Most people do not believe that the Mona Lisa has any evident flaws..
If 'Most people' believe that Mona Lisa has no flaws, the conclusion can be an explanation. But if 'Most people' believe that the painting has flaw, the conclusion will not hold true.
B.
The creator of the Mona Lisa, Leonardo DaVinci, did not regard the painting as his finest work.The conclusion has nothing to do with what the creator regards. The conclusion has to do with "Most People" not seeing the flaw and the true scope.
C.
It is possible for most people to understand the true scope of 15th and 16th century European painting.
This addresses only half of the conclusion. It only discusses the possibility and not the fact. It doesn't give any detail about whether Most people understand the true scope.
D.
Other European paintings of the 15th and 16th century were once better known than the Mona Lisa.This doesn't support the conclusion that the popularity prevents from seeing the flaws and from understanding true scope.
E.
Most art scholars feel that The Last Supper is a superior painting to the Mona Lisa.the conclusion is talking about "Most people" and not about 'Most art scholars'. Hence this options doesn't strengthen the conclusion