Rickooreo
Hi, can you please help me understand how to eliminate option E. The person stating that polls is falsified is not true becasue it is his change of opinion and hence since at first place itself the polls are not falsified but is mere change of opinion, hence, it matches the required of question stem i.e to "news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism"
One of the pollsters
admitted to falsifying data. So, it's not reasonable to criticize the news item by saying that maybe the people just changed their opinion -- we
know that the pollster intentionally altered the data, which is a problem even if people DO change their minds about technology.
We can't criticize the news item with the info in (E), because the pollsters admitted to falsifying data.
By contrast, here's (A):
Quote:
the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded
We know that the survey data cannot be trusted. But the news item takes that fact and concludes that the
opposite of the data must be true. The survey said that most people
favored investment in tech, so the author concludes that most people are
against investment in tech.
That's a pretty weak argument -- if the survey can't be trusted, then we can't use that same data to conclude
anything whatsoever. We have no idea what the dishonest pollster actually changed, and what the real data might have indicated.
That's why (A) is the correct answer.
I hope that helps!
if the concl. will be accepted by the public won't it means that the author's conclusion is wrong ?