Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 04:51 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 04:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,776
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,776
Kudos: 810,754
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ATC93
Joined: 31 Dec 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
14
 [3]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 16
Kudos: 14
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Mar 2026
Posts: 291
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 239
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 291
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,805
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,805
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rickooreo
Hi, can you please help me understand how to eliminate option E. The person stating that polls is falsified is not true becasue it is his change of opinion and hence since at first place itself the polls are not falsified but is mere change of opinion, hence, it matches the required of question stem i.e to "news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism"
One of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. So, it's not reasonable to criticize the news item by saying that maybe the people just changed their opinion -- we know that the pollster intentionally altered the data, which is a problem even if people DO change their minds about technology.

We can't criticize the news item with the info in (E), because the pollsters admitted to falsifying data.

By contrast, here's (A):
Quote:
(A) the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded
We know that the survey data cannot be trusted. But the news item takes that fact and concludes that the opposite of the data must be true. The survey said that most people favored investment in tech, so the author concludes that most people are against investment in tech.

That's a pretty weak argument -- if the survey can't be trusted, then we can't use that same data to conclude anything whatsoever. We have no idea what the dishonest pollster actually changed, and what the real data might have indicated.

That's why (A) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
deepdinda95
Joined: 14 Mar 2021
Last visit: 25 Nov 2023
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
News item: The result of a recent public survey has been called into question because one of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. The survey originally concluded that most people in the country favor investing more money in information technologies. Because falsified data were included in the survey, its conclusion is not true; a majority does not favor more investment in information technologies.

The news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism because it fails to consider the possibility that

(A) the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded

(B) the conclusion of the survey will be accepted by the public even though falsified data were used

(C) other pollsters in other surveys also may have falsified data

(D) some people who responded to the survey were lying

(E) people???s opinions about investing in information technologies can change as new technologies are developed
Why is the answer A
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,805
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deepdinda95
News item: The result of a recent public survey has been called into question because one of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. The survey originally concluded that most people in the country favor investing more money in information technologies. Because falsified data were included in the survey, its conclusion is not true; a majority does not favor more investment in information technologies.

The news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism because it fails to consider the possibility that

(A) the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded

(B) the conclusion of the survey will be accepted by the public even though falsified data were used

(C) other pollsters in other surveys also may have falsified data

(D) some people who responded to the survey were lying

(E) people???s opinions about investing in information technologies can change as new technologies are developed
Why is the answer A
Check out this post and let us know if you have any further questions!
User avatar
pdfff
Joined: 10 Mar 2023
Last visit: 21 Dec 2023
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Rickooreo
Hi, can you please help me understand how to eliminate option E. The person stating that polls is falsified is not true becasue it is his change of opinion and hence since at first place itself the polls are not falsified but is mere change of opinion, hence, it matches the required of question stem i.e to "news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism"
One of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. So, it's not reasonable to criticize the news item by saying that maybe the people just changed their opinion -- we know that the pollster intentionally altered the data, which is a problem even if people DO change their minds about technology.

We can't criticize the news item with the info in (E), because the pollsters admitted to falsifying data.

By contrast, here's (A):
Quote:
(A) the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded
We know that the survey data cannot be trusted. But the news item takes that fact and concludes that the opposite of the data must be true. The survey said that most people favored investment in tech, so the author concludes that most people are against investment in tech.

That's a pretty weak argument -- if the survey can't be trusted, then we can't use that same data to conclude anything whatsoever. We have no idea what the dishonest pollster actually changed, and what the real data might have indicated.

That's why (A) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
how can I eliminate option b?
if the concl. will be accepted by the public won't it means that the author's conclusion is wrong ?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,805
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,805
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pdfff
GMATNinja
Rickooreo
Hi, can you please help me understand how to eliminate option E. The person stating that polls is falsified is not true becasue it is his change of opinion and hence since at first place itself the polls are not falsified but is mere change of opinion, hence, it matches the required of question stem i.e to "news item???s argument is vulnerable to criticism"
One of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. So, it's not reasonable to criticize the news item by saying that maybe the people just changed their opinion -- we know that the pollster intentionally altered the data, which is a problem even if people DO change their minds about technology.

We can't criticize the news item with the info in (E), because the pollsters admitted to falsifying data.

By contrast, here's (A):

Quote:
the conclusion of the survey would be verified if the falsified data were excluded
We know that the survey data cannot be trusted. But the news item takes that fact and concludes that the opposite of the data must be true. The survey said that most people favored investment in tech, so the author concludes that most people are against investment in tech.

That's a pretty weak argument -- if the survey can't be trusted, then we can't use that same data to conclude anything whatsoever. We have no idea what the dishonest pollster actually changed, and what the real data might have indicated.

That's why (A) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!

how can I eliminate option b?

if the concl. will be accepted by the public won't it means that the author's conclusion is wrong ?
Note that the author's conclusion doesn't actually relate to whether or not the survey will be accepted. Rather, the author is concluding that the survey's conclusion is "not true."

How does (B) affect this conclusion?

Quote:
the conclusion of the survey will be accepted by the public even though falsified data were used
Well, notice that acceptance by the public doesn't directly relate to whether the survey is true or not. It's possible that a false survey would be accepted by the public, or that a true survey would be rejected. In other words, the public's reaction doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the truth or falsehood of the survey.

For that reason, (B) doesn't provide a possibility that renders the argument vulnerable to criticism, which makes it incorrect.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
SudhanshuC
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Location: Canada
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q82 V77 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q82 V77 DI80
Posts: 44
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A

Although the data is false, we do not know to what extent it is false (1% or 51% out of all 100 data points) and whether we can exclude falsified data from the survey to arrive at the correct data and hence arrive at the correct result.
Hence, Option A is the correct answer.
..................................................................................................................

Option D is wrong as it is not about the actual opinion of people but what people casted as a vote in the survey, even if they think that vote is not as per them.

Option C - Completely unrelated.

Option B - Acceptance of false data (by public) is not the case. Here, the assumption is that the false data is surely leading to an incorrect conclusion.

Option E - Change of people’s opinion (due to tech changes) is out of scope and not surely telling that the conclusion is false.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts