Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 10:35 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 10:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
phoenix2194
Joined: 01 Mar 2022
Last visit: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
382
 [5]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
Schools: ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40
Schools: ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40
Posts: 53
Kudos: 382
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 342
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 342
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
desertEagle
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Last visit: 03 Aug 2025
Posts: 550
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 413
Posts: 550
Kudos: 348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 342
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 342
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
desertEagle
Mavisdu1017
How should I comprehend the OA? How does it shift in meaning?
I was totally confused. Anybody can explain?

"no longer integrated" changes to "disintegrated"
HI,desertEagle I think you got wrong bro, the choice says (a key term) that shifts in meaning, but what you said is two terms rather than one key term.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 03 Dec 2025
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
547
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 547
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bethebest96
experts please explain

"Integrity" has two meanings. One is a sort of 'moral uprightness.' So someone who has 'integrity' is honest, kind, fair, principled, etc. But "integrity" also means 'unified' or 'held together.'

This arguments shifts from the moral meaning to the structural meaning. If a business loses its integrity (in the moral sense) than it is 'no longer integrated' (structural sense), so it 'literally disintegrates' (structural sense).

I would not worry about this question. I am quite sure this is an LSAT Logical Reasoning question. LSAT Logical Reasoning does overlap with GMAT CR, but there are significant differences that a GMAT studier would not need. I can't recall an official GMAT question that tests this kind of 'term shift,' but the LSAT does it with some regularity.
User avatar
Dkhapllicator
Joined: 23 Apr 2023
Last visit: 28 Jun 2024
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 36
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument

(A) takes for granted that the survival of businesses is the only important ethical concern; Nowhere is this mentioned, nor is it an assumption upon which this argument relies, so NO to this one.

(B) confuses a cause of integrity with an effect of integrity; So a solid business shows more integrity than a failing one, or opposite? This is not mentioned here.

(C) contains a key term that shifts in meaning from one sense to another; Hmm, lets see. Argument mentions integrity (moral/ethical sense), then moves to integrated (as in structural) so this is correct.

(D) overlooks the possibility that integrity is not a public-relations or management goal of some businesses Does not matter and is not mentioned.

(E) takes for granted that a condition required for the conclusion to be true necessarily makes the conclusion true The argument doesn't. It states without integrity businesses will disintegrate, but lacks in the middle of this where structural integrity is mixed up in meaning. So this is not important.
User avatar
Palpable
Joined: 04 Jul 2021
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 26
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dkhapllicator
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument

(A) takes for granted that the survival of businesses is the only important ethical concern; Nowhere is this mentioned, nor is it an assumption upon which this argument relies, so NO to this one.

(B) confuses a cause of integrity with an effect of integrity; So a solid business shows more integrity than a failing one, or opposite? This is not mentioned here.

(C) contains a key term that shifts in meaning from one sense to another; Hmm, lets see. Argument mentions integrity (moral/ethical sense), then moves to integrated (as in structural) so this is correct.

(D) overlooks the possibility that integrity is not a public-relations or management goal of some businesses Does not matter and is not mentioned.

(E) takes for granted that a condition required for the conclusion to be true necessarily makes the conclusion true The argument doesn't. It states without integrity businesses will disintegrate, but lacks in the middle of this where structural integrity is mixed up in meaning. So this is not important.

I had kept C but selected E because I read the 'integrated' and 'disintegrated' to be an analogy with survival of the company , instead of wordplay on the meaning of integrity.

If you think along those lines then E holds i.e., a company without integrity would no longer be integrated is insufficient to say that it would disintegrate. Does this make sense?

I know integrated isn't absolutely the right word but structurally broken can be an analogy for a company to not be surviving well.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Dkhapllicator
Joined: 23 Apr 2023
Last visit: 28 Jun 2024
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 36
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Palpable
Dkhapllicator
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument

(A) takes for granted that the survival of businesses is the only important ethical concern; Nowhere is this mentioned, nor is it an assumption upon which this argument relies, so NO to this one.

(B) confuses a cause of integrity with an effect of integrity; So a solid business shows more integrity than a failing one, or opposite? This is not mentioned here.

(C) contains a key term that shifts in meaning from one sense to another; Hmm, lets see. Argument mentions integrity (moral/ethical sense), then moves to integrated (as in structural) so this is correct.

(D) overlooks the possibility that integrity is not a public-relations or management goal of some businesses Does not matter and is not mentioned.

(E) takes for granted that a condition required for the conclusion to be true necessarily makes the conclusion true The argument doesn't. It states without integrity businesses will disintegrate, but lacks in the middle of this where structural integrity is mixed up in meaning. So this is not important.

I had kept C but selected E because I read the 'integrated' and 'disintegrated' to be an analogy with survival of the company , instead of wordplay on the meaning of integrity.

If you think along those lines then E holds i.e., a company without integrity would no longer be integrated is insufficient to say that it would disintegrate. Does this make sense?

I know integrated isn't absolutely the right word but structurally broken can be an analogy for a company to not be surviving well.

Posted from my mobile device

Yeah I see what you mean. But here the shift in meaning is so drastic that it just doesnt make sense in the argument. It would be like going from sex as a gender in one sentence to the physical act in the next. Regardless, we now know what to do if we get a similar case on official test :) (though it is unlikely to see something like this)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts