Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 23:17 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 23:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
810,699
 [9]
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,699
 [9]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
milanrajb
Joined: 17 Apr 2022
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
42
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 89
Kudos: 42
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DIVYANKSRIVASTAVA
Joined: 07 Jun 2022
Last visit: 22 Aug 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V16
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V16
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AnandRB
Joined: 30 Nov 2021
Last visit: 28 May 2023
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Booth '27
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GMAT 2: 640 Q45 V33
GPA: 3.32
Schools: Booth '27
GMAT 2: 640 Q45 V33
Posts: 19
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument tell us that despite enough water for all for several years , the residents to city Q are forced to cutdown or reduce the usage of water .

To resolve this paradox , we need to look for an answer choice that will address both the issues.

(A) The supply of water in the springs is greater at some times of the year than at others.
This choice fails to address the issue highlighted in the argument. When the supply of water is more or less is insignificant to the argument. The argument wants us to reason why residents are forced to cut down on usage despite adequate ground water supply for several years. OUT OF SCOPE .

(B) Residents of City Q rely heavily on water for their cooking and cleaning.
How the residents of city Q use the water available to them is not mentioned anywhere in the argument . OUT OF SCOPE.

(C) City Q has not sought out alternative water sources.
Again OUT OF SCOPE .

(D) Most of the water in the springs is allocated to industrial uses and not drinking.
If most of the water in the springs is allocated to industrial uses then the quantity of water available to the resident of City Q for domestic usage is less and hence they will have to cut down on water usage to sustain for longer ….CORRECT

(E) City Q has yet to completely tap into all of its underground springs.

Out Of Scope
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 342
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 342
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think both B and D are okay.
For B, water consumption includes not only drinking, but also other usages, such as cooking and cleaning. Thus water in the springs is NOT necessarily enough for heavy consumption of cooking and cleaning, although it is more than enough water to satisfy the demand for drinking water.
So B can also explain why should cut off water consumption. Discussion appreciated.
User avatar
apurvag95
Joined: 31 May 2021
Last visit: 27 Dec 2024
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34 (Online)
GRE 1: Q164 V157
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34 (Online)
GRE 1: Q164 V157
Posts: 17
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to current paradox, the city has water in springs but let residents are asked to cut down on the usage, what must be the reason?

(A) The supply of water in the springs is greater at some times of the year than at others. - Not relevant, we are talking about total water we already have.

(B) Residents of City Q rely heavily on water for their cooking and cleaning. - The allocation and usage of water is not relevant here, it's the water available vs consumption.

(C) City Q has not sought out alternative water sources. - If it will sought out, we may find more water, not relevant.

(D) Most of the water in the springs is allocated to industrial uses and not drinking. - correct, this choice resolves the difference of water avaialble vs water available for consumption.

(E) City Q has yet to completely tap into all of its underground springs. - If the city does find more water, there may be no need of reduction of consumption. Not relevant.
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 673
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,453
Location: India
Posts: 673
Kudos: 173
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
City Q has access to abundant fresh water that it draws from underground springs. There is more than enough water in the springs to satisfy the city residents’ demand for drinking water for the next several years. Still, it is typical for residents of City Q to be forced to either reduce or completely cut off their water consumption.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the situation described above?

(A) The supply of water in the springs is greater at some times of the year than at others.
Incorrect, the conclusion says "typical" which means that it is normal for residents to either reduce or completely cut off consumption, this option doesn't help us much.

(B) Residents of City Q rely heavily on water for their cooking and cleaning.
Incorrect, it doesn't matter what is the use, this option doesn't give us any reason why residents of City Q to be forced to either reduce or completely cut off their water consumption.

(C) City Q has not sought out alternative water sources.
Incorrect, the argument already says that there is more than enough water in the springs to satisfy the city residents’ demand for drinking water for the next several years, this option doesn't give us any reason why residents of City Q to be forced to either reduce or completely cut off their water consumption.

(D) Most of the water in the springs is allocated to industrial uses and not drinking.
Correct, this says that most of the water is not of use for residents so they are left with no other choice but either reduce or completely cut off their water consumption.

(E) City Q has yet to completely tap into all of its underground springs.
Incorrect, the conclusion says water is abundant which means residents should have been able to use water despite completely tapping into springs but that's not the case, also, the conclusion says "typical" which means that it is normal for residents to either reduce or completely cut off consumption, this option doesn't help us much.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts