The number of people sentenced to death by state courts in State X has dropped significantly this year, compared to the number for the last five years. State legislators attribute this decrease entirely to the deterrent effect of the controversial public broadcast last January of the execution of serial killer John Doe.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the state legislators' explanation for the decrease in the number of death sentences?
A. For the last six years, State X has reported the highest number of death sentences of all the states that authorize the death penalty.
B. The number of households that watched the broadcast of the John Doe execution was much lower than expected.
C. Federalization of many capital offenses has removed the majority of the most heinous homicide cases from the state courts.
D. A civil rights group has been successful in obtaining a judicial order enjoining the state from broadcasting any executions until the Supreme Court reviews the legality of such broadcasts.
E. The homicide rate in State X has dropped by ten percent this year.[fraction][/fraction]
Argument
- decrease in number of death sentence was due to deterrent effect of the controversial public broadcast of serial killer execution.
Weaking would be something else reducing the number of death sentence.
My answer is C. If majority of homicides cases was removed from the court, then it is highly likely that number of death sentence dropped.