Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 06:55 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 06:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,778
Own Kudos:
810,779
 [7]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,778
Kudos: 810,779
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,903
Own Kudos:
5,452
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,903
Kudos: 5,452
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stefanobrunelli
Joined: 12 Nov 2021
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
devendra.c
Joined: 06 Sep 2023
Last visit: 14 Feb 2024
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The university's decision to scale back significantly its teaching of the literary and philosophical classics of the Western Tradition is misguided. Proponents of the move argue that today's students are not interested in these works and desire more practical business-related courses that will help them in their future careers. But any student lacking a sufficient grounding in the thought and tradition that underlie the present civilization cannot be said to be fully educated. The classics are the primary vehicle for instilling such knowledge.

Which of the following best expresses the relationship between the two bolded statements above?

A. The first statement offers a hypothesis and the second statement offers conflicting evidence.

B. The first statement suggests an alternative explanation for the phenomenon described in the second statement.

C. The second statement provides evidence for a conclusion drawn in the first statement.

D. The second statement must be true for the first statement to be true.

E. The second statement is an inference drawn from the first statement.

I had picked D myself, but after re-assessing the options here's why D isn't the answer:

D says that the second bolded statement (Classics are the PRIMARY VEHICLE for such knowledge) must be true for the first bolded statement to be true. However, even if classics aren't the primary vehicle, say something else is the primary vehicle and classics are only the secondary vehicle for obtaining such knowledge, even in that case the decision can be misguided.

Please share the OE :)
User avatar
shubhim20
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 27 Nov 2025
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 108
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why c and not D Bunuel please provide explanation
Bunuel
The university's decision to scale back significantly its teaching of the literary and philosophical classics of the Western Tradition is misguided. Proponents of the move argue that today's students are not interested in these works and desire more practical business-related courses that will help them in their future careers. But any student lacking a sufficient grounding in the thought and tradition that underlie the present civilization cannot be said to be fully educated. The classics are the primary vehicle for instilling such knowledge.

Which of the following best expresses the relationship between the two bolded statements above?

A. The first statement offers a hypothesis and the second statement offers conflicting evidence.

B. The first statement suggests an alternative explanation for the phenomenon described in the second statement.

C. The second statement provides evidence for a conclusion drawn in the first statement.

D. The second statement must be true for the first statement to be true.

E. The second statement is an inference drawn from the first statement.
User avatar
karmachaser
Joined: 26 Nov 2023
Last visit: 14 Apr 2026
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also had to decide between the two. And why I selected C was that it was simply the more precise / accurate answer choice.

First bold statement is clearly a conclusion. And the second is a premise supporting the conclusion.

Whereas D states the second MUST be true for the first statement (a conclusion) to be true. But you can argue it’s not necessary for the argument to be sound. Since the statement before says students will be less educated without it.
User avatar
gabgol1998
Joined: 26 Mar 2025
Last visit: 22 Oct 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 17
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The university's decision to scale back significantly its teaching of the literary and philosophical classics of the Western Tradition is misguided. Proponents of the move argue that today's students are not interested in these works and desire more practical business-related courses that will help them in their future careers. But any student lacking a sufficient grounding in the thought and tradition that underlie the present civilization cannot be said to be fully educated. The classics are the primary vehicle for instilling such knowledge.

Which of the following best expresses the relationship between the two bolded statements above?

A. The first statement offers a hypothesis and the second statement offers conflicting evidence.

B. The first statement suggests an alternative explanation for the phenomenon described in the second statement.

C. The second statement provides evidence for a conclusion drawn in the first statement.

D. The second statement must be true for the first statement to be true.

E. The second statement is an inference drawn from the first statement.

The second statement provides evidence for a conclusion drawn in the first statement.

Why the second statement provides evidence? Saying "The classics are the primary vehicle for..." is a claim made by the author. It does not come from any research, it's not a revealed or well-known fact. It might not be the primary vehicle, how about the secondary vehicle? Is there a finding to support that this is the primary one? Not at all. Hence, letter D.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts