Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 04:05 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 04:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,774
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,774
Kudos: 810,744
 [126]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
114
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,842
Own Kudos:
7,097
 [23]
Given Kudos: 211
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,842
Kudos: 7,097
 [23]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
11,454
 [9]
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,454
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Kmohan1
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 22 Feb 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question asks to logically complete the argument. The dash is present in the conclusion of the argument.
A- Incorrect-There is nothing in the passage that talks about the real-world facts about art. The historical periods might be incompatible because historians have different interests. This statement does not mean that real-world facts are not accurate.
Incorrect

B- As stated in the passage, Historians create "history", which are derived from an order existing in the real world of historical fact. The patterns discovered depend on the aim of the investigator. So it can be assumed that accounts of these historians can be arbitrary.
Incorrect

C- As stated in the passage, historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests. So it cannot be assumed that periods of artistic style delineated will coincide.
Correct

D- As stated in the passage, patterns discovered in that world depend in part on the aims of the investigator. Historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry have different aims. So it can be assumed that historical patterns defined by the different historians will differ appreciably
Incorrect

E- As stated in the passage, historians derived history from an order existing in the real world of historical fact. The passage also states that the patterns discovered in real world of historical facts depend in part on the aims of the investigator. So it can be assumed that there are facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derived.
Correct
User avatar
720blazeit
Joined: 11 Apr 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2024
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 6
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had a tough time understanding the given argument in the first place
avatar
Jayam12
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 19 Jun 2025
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Posts: 54
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had a tough time understanding option B. The sentence structure seems complicated. How do I break it down?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,393
 [4]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,393
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
Historians create ideas we call "history," which are derived from an order existing in the real world of historical fact. Since the patterns discovered in that world depend in part on the aims of the investigator, however, historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests. Thus, insofar as the aims of historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry are different, it cannot be assumed that

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A. real-world facts about art will ever be accurately represented
B. the accounts of these historians will ever be anything but arbitrary
C. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide
D. the historical patterns defined by these historians will differ appreciably
E. there are any facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derived
­
Hard to understand if you are not a history major! But this is what I will do:

Premises:
Historians create history from an order existing in the real world (I don't understand it fully, but ok, I will just take this to be so.)
The patterns of real world depend on the aims of the investigator so historians with diff interests will define it differently. (Ok, at least this makes sense that what history they create depends on their perspective)

Conclusion: 
So, assuming that the aims of historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry are different, it cannot be assumed that ... 

What am I looking for? Something that says: "they will create similar history"
I am given that the patterns depend on their aim and the aims of all these historians are different. So the history they create should be different. I cannot assume that the history they create would be same.

A. real-world facts about art will ever be accurately represented

We do not know what is "accurate representation" and if one does exist. Ignore.

B. the accounts of these historians will ever be anything but arbitrary

No one said that their account are arbitrary. They are dependent of their aims so they are different. They could all make sense in their own way.

C. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide

This is what I was looking for. This says: "the periods defined by these historians will coincide".
It makes sense that we cannot assume that the periods defined by these historians will coincide. We expect them to be different. 

D. the historical patterns defined by these historians will differ appreciably

We do expect them to differ.

E. there are any facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derived

There are. Just that the patterns are different when viewed with different aims. 

Answer (C)
User avatar
user1937
Joined: 04 Apr 2024
Last visit: 27 Apr 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 62
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The word "insofar" made me choose the complete opposite option.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 706
Kudos: 212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Historians create ideas we call "history," which are derived from an order existing in the real world of historical fact. - fact.

Since the patterns discovered in that world depend in part on the aims of the investigator, however, historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests. Thus, insofar as the aims of historians of music, painting, literature, and poetry are different, it cannot be assumed that

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A. real-world facts about art will ever be accurately represented - no challenge on facts.

B. the accounts of these historians will ever be anything but arbitrary - Means the are arbitrary. Out of scope.

C. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide - ok.

D. the historical patterns defined by these historians will differ appreciably - opposite.

E. there are any facts from which patterns of artistic style may be derived - no challenge on facts.
User avatar
siddharth_
Joined: 17 Oct 2023
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q85 V85 DI80
GPA: 8.6
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q85 V85 DI80
Posts: 74
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Historians make history according to how they perceive the facts of the real world.
Their perception depends on their aims.
Aims of different historians are different.
Therefore, we can assume that historical accounts of different historians are different.

Or, we cannot assume that historical accounts of different historians would be similar.

A. No data about the ‘accuracy of history’ by the historians with different aims.

B. Anything, but arbitrary = Not arbitrary. So, we can’t assume not arbitrary, or - we can assume arbitrary (random / without reason).
Now this is what the choice says.
Let’s think - can we assume the history by these historians to be without reason? Certainly not, we don’t have any such data in the argument.

C. Essentially, this says their accounts will coincide. Exactly what we needed.
We cannot assume that their accounts will coincide.

D. Opposite. They will actually differ appreciably.

E. this goes against the premise. There are different patterns seen and accounted differently, by these historians, depending on their aims.
User avatar
soumyab12
Joined: 16 Mar 2023
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 28
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChiranjeevSingh AnishPassi

Why do we need to assume that the period described by these historians will not coincide? Per my understanding, the argument is saying that every historian has a different version of “history” or different accounts of the same events, as per their aims and interests. In the sense that every historian wants to paint a different picture of certain happenings that best serve their personal end goals so for this why can't historians be talking about the same period?
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 427
Own Kudos:
3,206
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 427
Kudos: 3,206
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think we will gain from a precise understanding of the following two statements:

1. historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests.
2. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide

Can you share your understanding of each of these statements? Please pay attention to every word there.


soumyab12
ChiranjeevSingh AnishPassi

Why do we need to assume that the period described by these historians will not coincide? Per my understanding, the argument is saying that every historian has a different version of “history” or different accounts of the same events, as per their aims and interests. In the sense that every historian wants to paint a different picture of certain happenings that best serve their personal end goals so for this why can't historians be talking about the same period?
User avatar
soumyab12
Joined: 16 Mar 2023
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 28
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I understood "incompatible" to mean two or more things that are not alike - in the sense that your statement 1 means if 2 historians having different interests define something, from reading their accounts you will not be able to infer that they are talking about the same thing because of their different interests.

But on searching the meaning of incompatible, I understand it means that 2 things cannot co-exist or happen simultaneously, and the argument says that about historical periods. So it makes sense that the periods defined by these historians cannot be the same because they ultimately want to communicate a different story altogether - not a different version of the same story.
ChiranjeevSingh
I think we will gain from a precise understanding of the following two statements:

1. historical periods will tend to be defined in incompatible ways by historians with different interests.
2. the periods of artistic style delineated by these historians will coincide

Can you share your understanding of each of these statements? Please pay attention to every word there.



Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts