Customers of ZQX financial services often call their financial advisers at ZQX for help in understanding the quarterly personal financial statements ZQX sends to customers. For years, there have been consistent complaints about the difficulty of understanding the statements. Despite this, and despite a new company initiative to improve customer service, ZQX has no plans to alter its statements.
Which of the following, if true, would best explain ZQX's reluctance to alter its statements?
A. A well respected industry survey consistently ranks ZQX as of the the best financial services companies in the nation.
B. ZQX's financial advisers are very effective at answering customers questions about their financial statements.
C. Customers who have regular contact with their financial advisers are tend to be willing to invest more money with those advisers.
D. Investors find the quarterly financial statements issued by other financial services companies less confusing that those issued by ZQX.
E. The company initiative to improve was prompted by complaints regarding certain advisers mishandling of customers fund.This CR problem is an "explain" problem, meaning that we need to find an explanation for a surprising fact. Note that, unlike most CR problems, this problem does not contain an argument - it's not providing evidence to support a conclusion. Use this knowledge to help yourself analyze the passage: find the surprise: what would we expect to happen? And what actually happened? Before even looking at the answer choices, I recommend clarifying what the correct answer must do:
We would expect ZQY to alter its financial statements. After all, it's trying to improve its customer service, and its financial statements have been criticised for being hard to understand. The surprise is: why didn't ZQX make its financial statements easier to understand?
It's important to be open-minded here, as there are many possible explanations. If we're reading in an active and engaged way, then some possible explanations may occur to us, such as something to do with regulations, or something to do with costs. However, it's important to be open-minded here, as there are many possible explanations and we don't know which direction the correct answer will take. Narrowing down to one line of thinking too early is a common mistake in solving CR problems.
As you eliminate answers, repeat what the correct answer must do. I find this a really effective way of keeping focused. Repeat: I'm looking for a reason why they didn't change their financial statements, even though they're trying to improve customer service.
A They want to improve their customer service. It doesn't matter if they're ranked high or low at the moment.
B This is a very tempting answer: it suggests that there's not really a problem at all, as the financial advisors can explain things. However, keep in mind that the company wants to improve its customer service. Just because the financial advisors can answer the complaints doesn't help this.
C (correct answer) This provides the necessary reason: they actually don't want to improve customer service in this particular area, because they make money from having confusing financial statements. There's another motive at play: profit. Companies sometimes do apparently illogical things because it increases their profit. This is the kind of common sense background knowledge that we're expected to use to solve CR problems, and there are many other CR problems that involve similar reasoning.
D This comparison is irrelevant, because we're looking for a reason why company ZQX wants to improve its customer service, i.e. relative to its own customer service, not relative to other companies.
E This is an irrelevant detail and doesn't relate to the company's decision not to change its financial statements.
For every problem that you solve and review, try to find some useful takeaway. Perhaps it's the way that "explain" probelms work; perhaps it's the move of clarifying what the correct answer must do (and then repeating that to yourself) before reading the answer choices; perhaps it's the importance of considering profit and cost when analyzing business behaviour; perhaps it's awareness of the common answer trap of making irrelevant comparisons.