Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:44 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,884
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,246
 [35]
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nidzo
Joined: 26 Nov 2019
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Location: South Africa
Posts: 958
Kudos: 1,478
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,848
Own Kudos:
7,114
 [3]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,848
Kudos: 7,114
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,412
 [1]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,412
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A study of project teams at professional service firms found that those teams feeling high levels of pressure to perform well for their clients tended to leave their clients less satisfied. The researchers hypothesized that this is because teams under higher pressure, regardless of the source, tend to deliberate less about important decisions and defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority.

Which of the following would, if true, most help support the researchers’ proposed explanation?

A. Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients.
B. The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients.
C. The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients.
D. Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members.
E. Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly.

­
­


Observation:
Those teams feeling high levels of pressure to perform well for their clients tended to leave their clients less satisfied.

Explanation:
Teams under higher pressure, regardless of the source, tend to deliberate less about important decisions and defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority.


It has been observed that teams feeling high pressure to perform actually led to low satisfaction of clients. The researchers hypothesize that this is because teams under pressure do not discuss - they just follow what seniors tell them to do. We want to support the explanation of the researchers. That is, we want to say that yes, this is what leads to less satisfaction among clients if the team is under high pressure.



A. Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients.

This is not correct. It does not support the given hypothesis that "teams under pressure just follow what seniors tell them to do" is the reason for low client expectation. In fact, it seems to give a different hypothesis - "teams under pressure do not interact with the client enough". We need an option that supports the given hypothesis.
Hence (A) is incorrect.

B. The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients.

Tells us the junior members have most info about client expectations. Then, if discussion does not take place and the junior members just do what seniors ask them to do, then it does seem likely that these teams are the ones where clients are least satisfied. So this option works.

C. The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients.

No comment on junior - senior members.

D. Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members.

No comment on junior - senior members. Though junior - senior likely means in terms of position, even if it were age related, less variation in age is irrelevant.

E. Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly.

This option gives us something that is common for many clients - unrealistically high expectations. It doesn't support that 'teams under pressure just follow what seniors tell them to do" is the reason for dissatisfaction among clients. In fact, it seems to give a different hypothesis of its own - clients have unrealistically high expectations.

Answer (B)


Inference questions are discussed here: https://youtu.be/PMnU9ULdSfs
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-7pour1ij.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-7pour1ij.png [ 97.31 KiB | Viewed 3091 times ]
User avatar
trungnx26
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 12 Dec 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's break down the question

The Argument
Observation: Teams under high pressure to perform for their clients tend to leave clients less satisfied.
Researchers’ Hypothesis: Under high pressure, teams deliberate less about important decisions and tend to defer to the judgment of the most senior members.
To support the researchers’ explanation, we need evidence that shows that when teams are under pressure, the structure of decision-making (i.e., deference to seniority) may lead to poorer client outcomes. Specifically, if the most informed opinions are not being used in the decision-making process, client satisfaction could decline.

Evaluating Answer Choices
(A) "Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients."

Analysis: This statement discusses client interaction levels, not the internal decision-making process or deference to senior members. It doesn't directly address the researchers’ explanation regarding the mechanism by which pressure leads to poorer decisions.
Conclusion: Does not support the explanation.
(B) "The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients."

Analysis: This statement directly supports the explanation. If junior members have more relevant information about what the project requires and what clients expect, then deferring to senior members (who may not possess this information) under high pressure could lead to poorer decisions and thus less client satisfaction.
Conclusion: This supports the researchers’ hypothesis.
(C) "The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients."

Analysis: While this might suggest that senior members have valuable experience, it does not speak to the issue of whether their judgments are optimal in a high-pressure environment, nor does it indicate that the most knowledgeable team members are being ignored.
Conclusion: Does not support the explanation.
(D) "Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members."

Analysis: This information is about the age range diversity within teams and does not connect to the decision-making process or the mechanism involving deference to seniority under pressure.
Conclusion: Does not support the explanation.
(E) "Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly."

Analysis: This focuses on client expectations rather than the internal dynamics of the team’s decision-making process. It does not provide evidence about whether high pressure leads to deference to senior members.
Conclusion: Does not support the explanation.


The best answer is (B) because it directly supports the researchers' hypothesis by showing that the more knowledgeable team members (the juniors) are not the ones making the key decisions when the team is under high pressure. This provides a plausible mechanism for why client satisfaction might decline.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 706
Kudos: 212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A study of project teams at professional service firms found that those teams feeling high levels of pressure to perform well for their clients tended to leave their clients less satisfied. - Finding.

The researchers hypothesized that this is because teams under higher pressure, regardless of the source, tend to deliberate less about important decisions and defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority. - Hypothesis is that the reason is because the tam "defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority."

Which of the following would, if true, most help support the researchers’ proposed explanation? - We need to support the hypothesis. What hypothesis? That the reason is because the team "defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority."

A. Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients. - I see why many of us choose this option. In a way this options tries to eliminate one source of pressure which is interaction with clients who may put unrealistic pressure. Thus strengthening the hypothesis. But there are a few issues with this.
1. Eliminating one cause doesn't mean "defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority" is the only cause. There can still be other causes.
2. The question stem says "regardless of the source" - meaning the question already renders this option useless. Because source can be anything, but we are not concerned about it. What we are concerned is that "defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority" is an issue. B covers this issue beautifully.
At best its out of scope.

B. The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients. - So even after having most information and knowing the customer needs, they just ignore and follow the sr. team members. ok

C. The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients. - out of scope.

D. Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members. - out of scope.

E. Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly. - irrelevant.
User avatar
suranamohit2694
Joined: 23 Jul 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 103
Products:
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't option B assuming that the hypothesis (which we are supposed to support) is already true?

In my opinion, option B wouldn't work if the hypothesis fails. And after all, "senior members make most of the important decisions" is just a hypothesis and not a proven fact. So the hypothesis can very well not be true.

We need to find something that independently strengthens this hypothesis without taking it's support, right?
Bunuel
A study of project teams at professional service firms found that those teams feeling high levels of pressure to perform well for their clients tended to leave their clients less satisfied. The researchers hypothesized that this is because teams under higher pressure, regardless of the source, tend to deliberate less about important decisions and defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority.

Which of the following would, if true, most help support the researchers’ proposed explanation?

A. Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients.
B. The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients.
C. The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients.
D. Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members.
E. Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly.

­
­
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-wmismmd8.png

Pro tip: Combine official questions for familiarity with GMAT Club Tests for analytics and tougher Focus-level practice so the real exam feels manageable. Explore →
User avatar
miag
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Dec 2023
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 404
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
GPA: 3.2/4
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
Posts: 404
Kudos: 159
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

The chain in the question is as follows:
High pressure → less deliberation + deferring to senior members → worse decisions → lower client satisfaction

We need an option that makes this chain more true/believable.

In Strengthen questions, we are allowed to temporarily accept the hypothesis and then ask: If this were true, what would make it lead to the outcome more plausibly? Option B doesn’t assume the hypothesis is proven, it supplies the missing reason why the hypothesized behavior would actually cause client dissatisfaction.

Hope this helps clarify! :)
suranamohit2694
Isn't option B assuming that the hypothesis (which we are supposed to support) is already true?

In my opinion, option B wouldn't work if the hypothesis fails. And after all, "senior members make most of the important decisions" is just a hypothesis and not a proven fact. So the hypothesis can very well not be true.

We need to find something that independently strengthens this hypothesis without taking it's support, right?

User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,026
Own Kudos:
11,370
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,026
Kudos: 11,370
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A study of project teams at professional service firms found that those teams feeling high levels of pressure to perform well for their clients tended to leave their clients less satisfied. The researchers hypothesized that this is because teams under higher pressure, regardless of the source, tend to deliberate less about important decisions and defer to the judgment of the members with the most seniority.

Which of the following would, if true, most help support the researchers’ proposed explanation?


Teams that feel high pressure to perform tend to leave clients less satisfied. Researchers say this happens because pressure makes teams deliberate less and defer more to the most senior members.

A. Those teams experiencing the highest levels of pressure tended to have the least interaction with clients.

This could explain lower satisfaction, but it does not support the specific mechanism of less deliberation and deference to seniors.

B. The more-junior members of the project teams tended to have the most information about a project’s needs and the expectations of clients.

This supports the mechanism. If junior members have the most project and client expectation information, then deferring to seniors (instead of using that junior knowledge) can lead to worse decisions and lower client satisfaction.

C. The team members with the most work experience commonly had project histories with diverse ranges of clients.

This suggests seniors may be broadly experienced, which would weaken the idea that deference to them harms outcomes.

D. Those teams experiencing less pressure tended to have less variation in age range among their members.

Age range variation is not tied to the proposed causal chain.

E. Many clients often have unrealistically high expectations of professional service firms, even when they do not pressure project teams directly.

This is about client expectations and says nothing about the team decision process the researchers propose.

Answer: (B)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,026
Own Kudos:
11,370
 [2]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,026
Kudos: 11,370
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suranamohit2694
Isn't option B assuming that the hypothesis (which we are supposed to support) is already true?

In my opinion, option B wouldn't work if the hypothesis fails. And after all, "senior members make most of the important decisions" is just a hypothesis and not a proven fact. So the hypothesis can very well not be true.

We need to find something that independently strengthens this hypothesis without taking it's support, right?

B is not assuming the hypothesis is true; it’s supplying a missing link that makes the hypothesis plausible.

The hypothesis is: pressure leads teams to defer to seniority and deliberate less, which leads to worse outcomes. B says the juniors have the most relevant client and project info. If deference to seniors happens, that deference would likely ignore the best info, so client satisfaction would drop. That is exactly how you support a causal explanation: show that the proposed mechanism would predict the observed effect.

So B is “If their mechanism is in play, it would hurt,” not “their mechanism definitely is in play.”
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts