Bunuel
A talent agent analyzed her company's records in an attempt to determine why they were placing so few actors in roles. She attributed the company's poor performance to the fact that often the actors sent to an audition were completely inappropriate for the role.
It can be concluded from the passage above that the agent believes that
A. certain actors are inappropriate for certain roles
B. the actors her company represents are not very good
C. it is difficult to predict how appropriate an actor will be for a role
D. her company does not send enough actors to audition for major roles
E. directors often cast actors who are inappropriate for the role
Official Explanation
Step 1: Identify the Question TypeThe question asks for something the agent can be concluded to believe, based on the passage. The correct answer will not be something directly stated in the stimulus, but will be logically deduced, making this an Inference question.
Step 2: Untangle the StimulusInference questions don't have conclusions and evidence, so just take stock of the information provided. Here, the agent is concerned that actors in her company are not getting placed in roles. As an explanation, she identifies the fact that actors are often sent to audition for roles not appropriate for them.
Step 3: Predict the AnswerWhile the exact answer may be difficult to predict, test each answer to make sure it directly follows from the information given. Keep a simple summary in mind: The roles are not always appropriate for the company's actors, and that's why they're not getting a lot of parts.
Step 4: Evaluate the Choices(A) is directly supported by the last line. This inappropriateness of the roles is the "fact" presented to justify the actors' lack of success.
(B) is not supported. The agent faults the appropriateness of the roles, not the actors' acting ability.
(C) is not supported. Perhaps it's actually very easy to know, but the agency hasn't been paying much attention and doing a bad job of checking this out beforehand.
(D) is unsupported because the agent never distinguishes between major roles and other roles, and there's no information about the number of actors or auditions.
(E) is a 180. The agent implies the opposite: not being appropriate for the role is the reason actors are not being cast.
TAKEAWAY: The correct answer to an Inference does not have to account for everything that was mentioned, but it will be directly supported.