To solve this question, let us deploy
IMS's four-step technique.
STEP #1 ->
IDENTIFY THE QUESTION TYPELet us read the question stem to identify the question type.
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the school officials' explanation for the decrease in complaints about shin splints?
The stem indicates a
weakening question.
STEP #2 ->
X-RAY THE ARGUMENTIn a
weakening question, it is a must to x-ray the argument and deconstruct it. Since we are to weaken the school officials' explanation for the decrease in complaints about shin splints, let us figure out the explanation as we x-ray the argument.
Quote:
For years, a considerable number of students on West County High School's track team complained about shin splints (medial tibial syndrome). However, during the most recent season, the number of students who complained about shin splints dropped significantly. School officials assert that this reduction in complaints occurred entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface, which absorbed much of the shock on the knees and shins that occurs when running and causes shin splints.
EXPLANATION: The reduction in complaints about shin splints occurred entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface, which absorbed much of the shock on the knees and shins that occurs when running and causes shin splints.
OBSERVATIONS: -> For years, a considerable number of students on West County High School's track team complained about shin splints.
-> During the most recent season, the number of students who complained about shin splints dropped significantly.
STEP #3 ->
FRAME A SHADOW ANSWERTo frame a shadow answer, we need to know what the correct answer should do. Remember, we are required to weaken the school officials' explanation for the decrease in complaints about shin splints; thus, the correct answer must cast doubt on the explanation.
SHADOW ANSWER: Any situation that leads us to believe that the reduction in complaints about shin splints did not occur entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface during the most recent season.
STEP #4 ->
ELIMINATE INCORRECT OPTIONSOptions that do not match the shadow answer can be eliminated.
(A) As a result of West County High School's adoption of better medical staff and new medical scanning devices, many students whose complaints would have been diagnosed in years past as an instance of shin splints are now diagnosed with a different condition. |
NOT A MATCH |
The argument states that a considerable number of students on West County High School's track team complained about shin splints for years. For one, this option does not tell us whether the students whose complaints would have been diagnosed in years past as an instance of shin splints were actually from the track team. Second, it does not indicate whether the students who complained were actually diagnosed by the school's medical staff. They might have had the diagnosis performed outside of the school. Clearly, this option does not lead us to believe that the reduction in complaints about shin splints did not occur entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface during the most recent season. |
ELIMINATE (B) West County High School built its track after a number of neighboring schools with similar track teams built new tracks and each school saw the number of complaints about shin splints drop. |
NOT A MATCH |
If West County High School built its track after a number of neighboring schools with similar track teams built new tracks and each school saw the number of complaints about shin splints drop, it does not give us any reason to believe that the reduction in complaints about shin splints did not occur entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface during the most recent season. For one, this option does not tell us whether the building of the track transpired right before the most recent season; second, we do not know from the option if the track built by West County High School was similar or dissimilar to the one built by the neighboring schools. If anything, this option reeks of irrelevance. |
ELIMINATE (C) This past season, members of West County High School's track team received and wore new and highly acclaimed shoes designed to soften the impact of running on the shin and knee. |
MATCHES THE SHADOW ANSWER |
The fact that this option mentions both 'this past season' and 'West County High School's track team' gives it credibility. Now, if members of West County High School's track team actually received and wore new and highly acclaimed shoes designed to soften the impact of running on the shin and knee in the past season, we have a valid reason to believe that the reduction in complaints about shin splints did not occur entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track that provided a softer running surface during the most recent season. The new running track could have been partly responsible for the reduction in complaints, not entirely for sure. |
KEEP(D) This past season, the total number of students who complained of pain while running rose. |
NOT A MATCH |
Whether or not the total number of students who complained of pain while running rose is irrelevant to understanding if the reduction in complaints about shin splints did not occur entirely as a result of the school's decision to build a new running track. Also, notice that this option does not tell us if the students complaining of pain used the newly-built track while running. |
ELIMINATE (E) The maker of the new track claims that on average, complaints about shin splints fall 25% when its tracks are implemented. |
NOT A MATCH |
Not worried about what the maker of the new track claims. |
ELIMINATE Therefore, (C) has to be the correct answer.