Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
03 Apr 2025, 00:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
79% (01:19) correct
21%
(01:47)
wrong
based on 136
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Private ownership of services traditionally considered to be the responsibility of the government will typically improve those services. The turnpike system in the United States of the nineteenth century demonstrates the truth of this principle; the system, which had previously been controlled by the government, became a more reliable system when taken over by private organizations.
Which of the following describes a significant flaw in the argument?
A. The author defends the conclusion by appealing to a person of authority.
B. The author distorts an opposing view in trying to show its weaknesses.
C. The author attacks what the author perceives as a wrong action by pointing gout another perceived wrong action.
D. The author generalizes from a sample not representative enough to establish the conclusion.
E. The author attributes two very different meanings to the same word.
Which of the following describes a significant flaw in the argument?
A. The author defends the conclusion by appealing to a person of authority.
B. The author distorts an opposing view in trying to show its weaknesses.
C. The author attacks what the author perceives as a wrong action by pointing gout another perceived wrong action.
D. The author generalizes from a sample not representative enough to establish the conclusion.
E. The author attributes two very different meanings to the same word.
03 Apr 2025, 00:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
- Claim: Private ownership of services traditionally handled by the government will typically improve those services.
- Evidence: In the 19th century, the U.S. turnpike system, once government-run, became more reliable under private ownership.
- Argument takes one historical example and uses it to support a broad generalization about private ownership improving services.
A. The author defends the conclusion by appealing to a person of authority.
No authority figure is mentioned => Eliminate ❌
B. The author distorts an opposing view in trying to show its weaknesses.
No opposing view is presented or distorted => Eliminate ❌
C. The author attacks what the author perceives as a wrong action by pointing gout another perceived wrong action.
Irrelevant, the argument doesn’t compare wrong actions => Eliminate ❌
D. The author generalizes from a sample not representative enough to establish the conclusion.
The argument takes one specific case (the turnpike system) and generalizes it to all services traditionally run by the government => Keep
E. The author attributes two very different meanings to the same word.
No ambiguity or wordplay like that is involved => Eliminate ❌
Answer: (D)
- Evidence: In the 19th century, the U.S. turnpike system, once government-run, became more reliable under private ownership.
- Argument takes one historical example and uses it to support a broad generalization about private ownership improving services.
A. The author defends the conclusion by appealing to a person of authority.
No authority figure is mentioned => Eliminate ❌
B. The author distorts an opposing view in trying to show its weaknesses.
No opposing view is presented or distorted => Eliminate ❌
C. The author attacks what the author perceives as a wrong action by pointing gout another perceived wrong action.
Irrelevant, the argument doesn’t compare wrong actions => Eliminate ❌
D. The author generalizes from a sample not representative enough to establish the conclusion.
The argument takes one specific case (the turnpike system) and generalizes it to all services traditionally run by the government => Keep
E. The author attributes two very different meanings to the same word.
No ambiguity or wordplay like that is involved => Eliminate ❌
Answer: (D)
03 Apr 2025, 22:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
The author mentions that Private Organisations are great in handling government services, this can be corroborated from the turnpike’s system outcome. The system became more reliable after it was handled by private organisations.
FLAW is the assumption made that “my kid doesn’t like strawberry candies, so all kids don’t like strawberry candies “ . A specific outcome is generalised to fit the entire gamut of population.
Let’s look into the options.
A. The author defends the conclusion by appealing to a person of authority.
No person of authority is mentioned in the question. Out of scope.
B. The author distorts an opposing view in trying to show its weaknesses.
There is no attack or contradiction of views. Out of scope.
C. The author attacks what the author perceives as a wrong action by pointing out another perceived wrong action.
Out of scope . The argument doesn't do this.
D. The author generalizes from a sample not representative enough to establish the conclusion.
This is the right one. The author uses ONE example (the turnpike system) to make a HUGE generalization about ALL government services.
E. The author attributes two very different meanings to the same word.
The author is not twisting words to her benefit. It is generalisation of an event. Out of scope.
Hence, Option D
